The problem of "clip thinking" in the context of the choice of teaching methods for students of higher educational institutions.

Marina A. Dorofeeva
{"title":"The problem of \"clip thinking\" in the context of the choice of teaching methods for students of higher educational institutions.","authors":"Marina A. Dorofeeva","doi":"10.17748/2075-9908-2021-13-2-244-264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the problem of the presence of clip thinking in a social group of young people-students. The novelty of the research lies in the question of the need for an interdisciplinary study of clip thinking as a biological, social and humanitarian phenomenon, and the priority in determining the essence of this phenomenon should be given to the cognitive sciences. The analysis of the results of methodological innovations of modern researchers reveals the charm of clip thinking as a new cognitive style and the presence of imperative recommendations on the transformation of the format of educational technologies in the direction of its adaptation to this mass phenomenon. The author of the article questions the thesis about the need to switch to teaching methods in higher education that take into account the peculiarities of clip thinking. The methodological basis for the study was: the concept of the theory of generations by N. Howe and W. Strauss, the concept of conceptual thinking by L.S. Vygotsky, the concept of cognitive styles by M.A. Kholodnaya, the concept of clip thinking by K.G. Frumkin. The results of the study (on the example of students of the FEFU Law School) show that it is wrong to apply the clip thinking model as the leading basic generational characteristic to Russian students a priori. Students are a differentiated community in which there is a variety of cognitive styles in individuals, including a wide distribution of the most productive of them – the conceptual-logical. In this regard, the author comes to the conclusion that educational technologies in higher education should combine methods that accumulate ways of reflecting reality in visual-figurative and verbal-logical expression, create an educational space in which to demonstrate ways of translating clip thinking into conceptual thinking and teach such refocusing, while it is necessary to teach students to use both cognitive styles and effectively switch between them, depending on the type of cognitive tasks associated with working with information.","PeriodicalId":220604,"journal":{"name":"Historical and social-educational ideas","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical and social-educational ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2021-13-2-244-264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the problem of the presence of clip thinking in a social group of young people-students. The novelty of the research lies in the question of the need for an interdisciplinary study of clip thinking as a biological, social and humanitarian phenomenon, and the priority in determining the essence of this phenomenon should be given to the cognitive sciences. The analysis of the results of methodological innovations of modern researchers reveals the charm of clip thinking as a new cognitive style and the presence of imperative recommendations on the transformation of the format of educational technologies in the direction of its adaptation to this mass phenomenon. The author of the article questions the thesis about the need to switch to teaching methods in higher education that take into account the peculiarities of clip thinking. The methodological basis for the study was: the concept of the theory of generations by N. Howe and W. Strauss, the concept of conceptual thinking by L.S. Vygotsky, the concept of cognitive styles by M.A. Kholodnaya, the concept of clip thinking by K.G. Frumkin. The results of the study (on the example of students of the FEFU Law School) show that it is wrong to apply the clip thinking model as the leading basic generational characteristic to Russian students a priori. Students are a differentiated community in which there is a variety of cognitive styles in individuals, including a wide distribution of the most productive of them – the conceptual-logical. In this regard, the author comes to the conclusion that educational technologies in higher education should combine methods that accumulate ways of reflecting reality in visual-figurative and verbal-logical expression, create an educational space in which to demonstrate ways of translating clip thinking into conceptual thinking and teach such refocusing, while it is necessary to teach students to use both cognitive styles and effectively switch between them, depending on the type of cognitive tasks associated with working with information.
高校学生教学方式选择中的“剪辑思维”问题。
本文考察了青年社会群体——学生中存在的剪辑思维问题。该研究的新颖之处在于需要对剪辑思维作为一种生物、社会和人道主义现象进行跨学科研究,并应优先考虑认知科学来确定这一现象的本质。通过对现代研究者方法论创新成果的分析,揭示了剪辑思维作为一种新的认知方式的魅力,并对教育技术形式的转型提出了迫切的建议,以适应这一大众现象。本文的作者对高等教育是否需要转向考虑剪辑思维特点的教学方法提出了质疑。本研究的方法论基础是:N. Howe和W. Strauss的代际理论概念、L.S. Vygotsky的概念思维概念、M.A. Kholodnaya的认知风格概念、K.G. Frumkin的片段思维概念。研究结果(以远东大学法学院学生为例)表明,将剪辑思维模式作为主要的基本代际特征先验地应用于俄罗斯学生是错误的。学生是一个差异化的群体,在这个群体中,个人的认知风格多种多样,其中最具生产力的认知风格——概念逻辑风格分布广泛。因此,笔者认为,高等教育中的教育技术应该结合在视觉-形象和语言-逻辑表达中积累反映现实的方式的方法,创造一个教育空间,在这个空间中展示将剪辑思维转化为概念思维的方式并教授这种重新聚焦,同时需要教会学生使用这两种认知风格并在两者之间有效转换。取决于与处理信息相关的认知任务的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信