Alternative Assessment Practices in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Shahriar Kaisar
{"title":"Alternative Assessment Practices in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Shahriar Kaisar","doi":"10.55529/jlep.35.37.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted many aspects of life including education and assessment practices in the higher education sectors. Universities worldwide had to adopt new assessment technologies as COVID-19-related restrictions made it impossible to conduct invigilated exams. Therefore, academics had to change their assessment styles, types, and formats to match the new normal. Although online education is a well-established domain where remote assessments are the usual practice, such a sudden shift made it extremely difficult to manage this within such short notice. Alternative assessments, such as online assessments, open-book exams, timed assessments, and online exams, were used as a replacement for traditional face-to-face exams. However, careful consideration and planning were necessary to ensure effectiveness, fairness, and prevention of academic misconduct. This paper examines alternative assessment practices used in different parts of the world, the historical context of invigilated exams, and the impacts of this sudden shift on academics and teaching pedagogy. Additionally, the paper provides recommended strategies to help academics plan assessment design as multi-mode delivery (i.e., hybrid approach offering both in-person and online options concurrently) and assessment practices are likely to continue in the post-COVID world Moving forward, universities must adapt to the changing assessment practices brought about by the pandemic and develop strategies to ensure academic integrity and fair assessment practices. This includes designing assessments that are appropriate for remote delivery, incorporating new assessment technologies, and ensuring that assessments are fair and secure. Furthermore, universities must continue to explore and develop new assessment practices that meet the needs of their students in the changing landscape of higher education.","PeriodicalId":138341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning and Educational Policy","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning and Educational Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55529/jlep.35.37.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted many aspects of life including education and assessment practices in the higher education sectors. Universities worldwide had to adopt new assessment technologies as COVID-19-related restrictions made it impossible to conduct invigilated exams. Therefore, academics had to change their assessment styles, types, and formats to match the new normal. Although online education is a well-established domain where remote assessments are the usual practice, such a sudden shift made it extremely difficult to manage this within such short notice. Alternative assessments, such as online assessments, open-book exams, timed assessments, and online exams, were used as a replacement for traditional face-to-face exams. However, careful consideration and planning were necessary to ensure effectiveness, fairness, and prevention of academic misconduct. This paper examines alternative assessment practices used in different parts of the world, the historical context of invigilated exams, and the impacts of this sudden shift on academics and teaching pedagogy. Additionally, the paper provides recommended strategies to help academics plan assessment design as multi-mode delivery (i.e., hybrid approach offering both in-person and online options concurrently) and assessment practices are likely to continue in the post-COVID world Moving forward, universities must adapt to the changing assessment practices brought about by the pandemic and develop strategies to ensure academic integrity and fair assessment practices. This includes designing assessments that are appropriate for remote delivery, incorporating new assessment technologies, and ensuring that assessments are fair and secure. Furthermore, universities must continue to explore and develop new assessment practices that meet the needs of their students in the changing landscape of higher education.
COVID-19大流行期间高等教育的替代评估实践
2019冠状病毒病大流行严重扰乱了生活的许多方面,包括高等教育部门的教育和评估实践。由于新冠肺炎疫情的限制,世界各地的大学都无法进行监考,因此不得不采用新的评估技术。因此,学者们不得不改变他们的评估风格、类型和格式,以适应新常态。尽管在线教育是一个成熟的领域,远程评估是通常的做法,但如此突然的转变使得在如此短的时间内管理这一领域变得极其困难。替代评估,如在线评估、开卷考试、定时评估和在线考试,被用作传统面对面考试的替代品。然而,仔细考虑和规划是必要的,以确保有效性、公平性和防止学术不端行为。本文考察了世界不同地区使用的替代评估实践,监考考试的历史背景,以及这种突然转变对学术和教学方法的影响。此外,本文还提供了建议策略,以帮助学者规划评估设计,因为多模式交付(即同时提供面对面和在线选项的混合方法)和评估实践可能会在covid - 19后的世界中继续下去。展望未来,大学必须适应大流行带来的不断变化的评估实践,并制定战略以确保学术诚信和公平的评估实践。这包括设计适合远程交付的评估,结合新的评估技术,并确保评估是公平和安全的。此外,大学必须继续探索和发展新的评估方法,以满足学生在不断变化的高等教育环境中的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信