Let's compare prototypes for tangible systems: but how and why?

Kirstin Kohler, Thorsten Hochreuter
{"title":"Let's compare prototypes for tangible systems: but how and why?","authors":"Kirstin Kohler, Thorsten Hochreuter","doi":"10.1145/2639189.2639229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a model (called Filter-Fidelity-Profiles), which allows us to describe, classify and systematically compare prototypes for tangible systems. Our Filter-Fidelity-Profiles (FFP) are based on two axes. One axis (the filter) reflects the quality of elements represented by the prototype. It provides a product centric, structured view on the design space of the final system. The second axis defines the fidelity (closeness) of these elements in relationship to those of the final system. Based on our literature survey, as well as our experience in industrial projects, the creation of prototypes is often more focused on capturing the design intent of their creators and lacks a more comprehensive view, considering the evaluation of these intents. Therefore it might miss opportunities in terms of efficiency and effectiveness during the design process. The reason being, that prototypes might have the wrong focus, and therefore might even cause errors during evaluation. In order to focus more on the relevant aspects of a prototype, our model works towards a definition of fundamental building blocks, and provides a language to describe them. This is a necessary first step to make prototypes comparable. Dedicated comparisons, allow us to investigate the variations between different prototypes in subsequent steps within the same project as well as between different processes and reveal its appropriateness for answering particular design questions. The FFP therefore aims to improve the usage of prototypes in general.","PeriodicalId":354301,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We introduce a model (called Filter-Fidelity-Profiles), which allows us to describe, classify and systematically compare prototypes for tangible systems. Our Filter-Fidelity-Profiles (FFP) are based on two axes. One axis (the filter) reflects the quality of elements represented by the prototype. It provides a product centric, structured view on the design space of the final system. The second axis defines the fidelity (closeness) of these elements in relationship to those of the final system. Based on our literature survey, as well as our experience in industrial projects, the creation of prototypes is often more focused on capturing the design intent of their creators and lacks a more comprehensive view, considering the evaluation of these intents. Therefore it might miss opportunities in terms of efficiency and effectiveness during the design process. The reason being, that prototypes might have the wrong focus, and therefore might even cause errors during evaluation. In order to focus more on the relevant aspects of a prototype, our model works towards a definition of fundamental building blocks, and provides a language to describe them. This is a necessary first step to make prototypes comparable. Dedicated comparisons, allow us to investigate the variations between different prototypes in subsequent steps within the same project as well as between different processes and reveal its appropriateness for answering particular design questions. The FFP therefore aims to improve the usage of prototypes in general.
让我们比较有形系统的原型:但是如何以及为什么?
我们引入了一个模型(叫做Filter-Fidelity-Profiles),它允许我们描述、分类和系统地比较有形系统的原型。我们的过滤器保真度配置文件(FFP)基于两个轴。一个轴(过滤器)反映了原型所代表的元素的质量。它为最终系统的设计空间提供了以产品为中心的结构化视图。第二个轴定义了这些元素与最终系统的关系的保真度(亲密度)。根据我们的文献调查,以及我们在工业项目中的经验,原型的创建通常更侧重于捕捉其创造者的设计意图,而缺乏更全面的观点,考虑到这些意图的评估。因此,在设计过程中,它可能会错过效率和有效性方面的机会。原因是,原型可能有错误的焦点,因此甚至可能在评估期间导致错误。为了更多地关注原型的相关方面,我们的模型致力于基本构建块的定义,并提供描述它们的语言。这是使原型具有可比性的必要的第一步。专门的比较,使我们能够在同一项目的后续步骤中调查不同原型之间的差异,以及不同过程之间的差异,并揭示其对回答特定设计问题的适用性。因此,FFP旨在改善原型的总体使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信