Utility of transaction-level hardware models in refinement checking

Yogesh S. Mahajan, S. Malik
{"title":"Utility of transaction-level hardware models in refinement checking","authors":"Yogesh S. Mahajan, S. Malik","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2010.5496650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Verifying a cycle-accurate RTL model against its functional specification using refinement checking uses a joint execution model to compare the executions of the two models. Creating and instrumenting such a joint execution model manually can be tedious and error-prone. In this paper, we illustrate the use of transaction-based models (e.g. [1]) in simplifying the process of creating and instrumenting joint execution models for refinement checking. We first show how transaction-based specification and implementation models allow simple refinement relations to be written using model variables and constructs. We then show how a joint encoding of the two models can be generated together with assertions expressing the specified refinement relation. This approach avoids the manual bookkeeping otherwise needed for coordinating the executions of the design and the specification, and exchanging information between the two models. We illustrate the ideas on a toy example.","PeriodicalId":200068,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (HLDVT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2010.5496650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Verifying a cycle-accurate RTL model against its functional specification using refinement checking uses a joint execution model to compare the executions of the two models. Creating and instrumenting such a joint execution model manually can be tedious and error-prone. In this paper, we illustrate the use of transaction-based models (e.g. [1]) in simplifying the process of creating and instrumenting joint execution models for refinement checking. We first show how transaction-based specification and implementation models allow simple refinement relations to be written using model variables and constructs. We then show how a joint encoding of the two models can be generated together with assertions expressing the specified refinement relation. This approach avoids the manual bookkeeping otherwise needed for coordinating the executions of the design and the specification, and exchanging information between the two models. We illustrate the ideas on a toy example.
在精化检查中使用事务级硬件模型
使用精化检查根据功能规范验证周期精确的RTL模型,使用联合执行模型来比较两个模型的执行。手动创建和检测这样的联合执行模型可能是乏味且容易出错的。在本文中,我们举例说明了基于事务的模型(例如[1])在简化为精化检查而创建和配置联合执行模型的过程中的使用。我们首先展示基于事务的规范和实现模型如何允许使用模型变量和构造编写简单的细化关系。然后,我们将展示如何生成两个模型的联合编码以及表达指定细化关系的断言。这种方法避免了协调设计和规范的执行以及在两个模型之间交换信息所需要的手工记录。我们用一个玩具例子来说明这些思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信