Freshwater scarcity and pricing in South Africa: conflicts between conservation and equity in the post-apartheid state

Liane Langstaff
{"title":"Freshwater scarcity and pricing in South Africa: conflicts between conservation and equity in the post-apartheid state","authors":"Liane Langstaff","doi":"10.21083/SURG.V4I1.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Africa faces water scarcity due to the contribution of climatic, geographic, and human variables. As reported by Statistics South Africa, persistent water scarcity and distributional inequity has arisen in a changing political arena from the period of colonization to the most recent chapter of South African governance from 1994 onwards [1]. In the policy context of a state struggling with the legacy of apartheid, conflicts regarding the pricing of freshwater resources have arisen [2]. With discrepancies between the higher price for water required to promote efficiency and conservation, and the alternative pricing system that would meet the South Africa’s responsibility to improve distributional fairness, the most recent challenges took place between 1994 and 2000 [3]. Consequently, the predominant problem linked to South Africa’s freshwater resources is how to allocate water amongst the competing uses of long term environmental and human welfare, without compromising the needs of the country’s urban poor. One perspective, which can provide insight on the issue of water scarcity in South Africa, is free market environmentalism. This branch of economic thought supports a system of water markets with prices that reflect the true cost of providing the resources along with subsidies to address the needs of the poor. Based on an evaluation of the impact of market incentives in South Africa since the 2001 market reforms, it has been determined that a pragmatic, free market environmentalist approach to water can yield economically efficient outcomes for the resource while mitigating distributional equity issues.","PeriodicalId":413751,"journal":{"name":"Studies by Undergraduate Researchers at Guelph","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies by Undergraduate Researchers at Guelph","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21083/SURG.V4I1.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

South Africa faces water scarcity due to the contribution of climatic, geographic, and human variables. As reported by Statistics South Africa, persistent water scarcity and distributional inequity has arisen in a changing political arena from the period of colonization to the most recent chapter of South African governance from 1994 onwards [1]. In the policy context of a state struggling with the legacy of apartheid, conflicts regarding the pricing of freshwater resources have arisen [2]. With discrepancies between the higher price for water required to promote efficiency and conservation, and the alternative pricing system that would meet the South Africa’s responsibility to improve distributional fairness, the most recent challenges took place between 1994 and 2000 [3]. Consequently, the predominant problem linked to South Africa’s freshwater resources is how to allocate water amongst the competing uses of long term environmental and human welfare, without compromising the needs of the country’s urban poor. One perspective, which can provide insight on the issue of water scarcity in South Africa, is free market environmentalism. This branch of economic thought supports a system of water markets with prices that reflect the true cost of providing the resources along with subsidies to address the needs of the poor. Based on an evaluation of the impact of market incentives in South Africa since the 2001 market reforms, it has been determined that a pragmatic, free market environmentalist approach to water can yield economically efficient outcomes for the resource while mitigating distributional equity issues.
南非的淡水稀缺和定价:后种族隔离国家中保护与公平之间的冲突
由于气候、地理和人为因素的影响,南非面临水资源短缺。据南非统计局报道,从殖民时期到1994年南非治理的最新篇章,在不断变化的政治舞台上,持续的水资源短缺和分配不平等已经出现[1]。在与种族隔离遗留问题作斗争的国家的政策背景下,淡水资源定价方面的冲突已经出现[2]。由于提高效率和节约用水所需的较高水价与满足南非改善分配公平责任的替代定价体系之间存在差异,最近的挑战发生在1994年至2000年之间[3]。因此,与南非淡水资源有关的主要问题是如何在长期环境和人类福利的相互竞争的用途之间分配水,而不损害该国城市穷人的需要。自由市场环境保护主义是一种视角,可以让我们对南非的水资源短缺问题有所了解。这一经济思想的分支支持水市场体系,其价格反映了提供资源的真实成本,并提供补贴以满足穷人的需求。根据对南非自2001年市场改革以来市场激励的影响的评估,确定了一种务实的、自由市场的环境保护主义方法可以在减轻分配公平问题的同时,为资源产生经济上有效的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书