The issue of determination of bail’s size under Ukrainian legislation and legislation of Anglo-American countries: comparatively – judicial analysis

M. Stefanchuk, N. Iveruk
{"title":"The issue of determination of bail’s size under Ukrainian legislation and legislation of Anglo-American countries: comparatively – judicial analysis","authors":"M. Stefanchuk, N. Iveruk","doi":"10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/58-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal regulation of bail's institute as a preventive measure in Ukraine and Anglo - American countries, including the aim of its application, bail's size and criteria for its determination, is the subject matter of this article. The authors support a point concerning to the inadvisability of legislative regulation of maximum bail's size as well as a judge's opportunity in certain circumstances to apply bail, size of which is lower than minimum level.\n\nThe purpose of article is to clarify strengths and weakness of legislative regulation of the bail in Ukraine, England and United States of America, to highlight a separate problems, arising in practice, to express recommendations and proposals regarding to the improvement of valid criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine.\n\nAnalyzing provisions of criminal – procedural legislation of England and United States of America, the authors provide a few bail's classifications, depending on way of making a deposit.\n\nBesides it, the authors detect the drawbacks of legislative technique of Anglo – American countries regarding to not taking by judges into account material and family state of accused and suspected person, that leads to taking into custody a significant number of people, who are not financially secured to make a deposit.\n\nThe decisions of the European Court on Human Rights as an international judicial institution regarding to determination of the bail's size, which will guarantee an enforcement of duties that a suspected person is obliged to do and will be defined taking into account a material state of a suspected person, are highlighted in this article.\n\nThe authors also explore an issue of determination of bail's object and emphasizes on the necessity of clarifying of the money origin with the aim to avoid money laundering, which is offence, predicted by art.209 of Criminal Code of Ukraine.\n\nInvestigating theoretical and practical aspects of the determination of bail's size, the authors make a conclusion regarding to the existence of certain difference in national legislation and legislation of Anglo – American countries, that is a result of belonging Ukraine to continental, and the USA and England – to Anglo – American countries. The authors state that prospective of further explorations of high stated issue are an improvement of legislation, implementation of world's experience, taking into account the legal positions of the European Court on Human Rights, etc.","PeriodicalId":399656,"journal":{"name":"Herald of criminal justice","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herald of criminal justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2413-5372.2019.4/58-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The legal regulation of bail's institute as a preventive measure in Ukraine and Anglo - American countries, including the aim of its application, bail's size and criteria for its determination, is the subject matter of this article. The authors support a point concerning to the inadvisability of legislative regulation of maximum bail's size as well as a judge's opportunity in certain circumstances to apply bail, size of which is lower than minimum level. The purpose of article is to clarify strengths and weakness of legislative regulation of the bail in Ukraine, England and United States of America, to highlight a separate problems, arising in practice, to express recommendations and proposals regarding to the improvement of valid criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine. Analyzing provisions of criminal – procedural legislation of England and United States of America, the authors provide a few bail's classifications, depending on way of making a deposit. Besides it, the authors detect the drawbacks of legislative technique of Anglo – American countries regarding to not taking by judges into account material and family state of accused and suspected person, that leads to taking into custody a significant number of people, who are not financially secured to make a deposit. The decisions of the European Court on Human Rights as an international judicial institution regarding to determination of the bail's size, which will guarantee an enforcement of duties that a suspected person is obliged to do and will be defined taking into account a material state of a suspected person, are highlighted in this article. The authors also explore an issue of determination of bail's object and emphasizes on the necessity of clarifying of the money origin with the aim to avoid money laundering, which is offence, predicted by art.209 of Criminal Code of Ukraine. Investigating theoretical and practical aspects of the determination of bail's size, the authors make a conclusion regarding to the existence of certain difference in national legislation and legislation of Anglo – American countries, that is a result of belonging Ukraine to continental, and the USA and England – to Anglo – American countries. The authors state that prospective of further explorations of high stated issue are an improvement of legislation, implementation of world's experience, taking into account the legal positions of the European Court on Human Rights, etc.
乌克兰与英美国家保释金数额确定问题的比较司法分析
乌克兰和英美国家对保释金制度作为一种预防措施的法律规制,包括保释金的适用目的、保释金的数额和保释金的确定标准,是本文的研究主题。作者支持关于立法规定最高保释金数额以及法官在某些情况下申请保释金数额低于最低保释金数额的机会的不可取的观点。本文的目的是澄清乌克兰、英国和美利坚合众国保释立法规制的优缺点,突出在实践中出现的单独问题,对乌克兰现行刑事诉讼立法的完善提出建议和建议。在分析英美刑事诉讼立法规定的基础上,根据保释金的交纳方式对保释金进行了分类。此外,作者还发现了英美国家立法技术的缺陷,即法官不考虑被告和嫌疑人的物质和家庭状况,导致大量没有经济保障的人被拘留。欧洲人权法院作为一个国际司法机构,在确定保释金数额方面所作的决定,将保证嫌疑犯必须履行的义务得到执行,并将在考虑到嫌疑犯的实际状况的情况下加以界定。作者还探讨了保释对象的确定问题,强调了澄清资金来源的必要性,以避免洗钱这一艺术预测的犯罪。《乌克兰刑法》第209条。通过对保释金数额确定的理论和实践考察,认为乌克兰保释金数额确定的国家立法与英美国家立法存在一定差异,这是由于乌克兰属于大陆国家,而美国和英国属于英美国家造成的。作者指出,进一步探讨人权问题的前景是改进立法、落实世界经验、考虑到欧洲人权法院的法律立场等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信