Coevolutionary Learning and Emergence in Technological Evolution: Conceptual Issues in Modeling

C. Reschke
{"title":"Coevolutionary Learning and Emergence in Technological Evolution: Conceptual Issues in Modeling","authors":"C. Reschke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1598749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main problem that a scientist encounters in analyzing the interaction between socio-economic and technological evolution is emergence. Emergence denotes the occurrence of unforeseen events, patterns of behavior. Shortly it is the surprise information that derails accepted knowledge. Emergence has been defined as the occurrence of new behaviors and properties on a system level through the interaction of elements that are individually not able to bring about the behavior or properties. Emergence is one of the main properties of evolutionary processes. If emergence is neglected, 'evolutionary' system analysis is reduced to questions of comparatively simple dynamical development. Difficult to treat, but crucial element is interaction. After formalizing the interaction in systems leading to emergence mathematically, Bertalanffy states: 'Physically, these statements are trivial; they could become problematic and lead to confused conceptions in biology, psychology and sociology only because of a misinterpretation of the mechanistic conception, the tendency being towards resolution of phenomena into independent elements and causal chains, while interrelations were bypassed'. This is the problem I want to deal with in the following pages: how can we model emergent phenomena without falling in the trap of reductionism, while at the same time keeping the model simple. To solve the problem just stated, I take the position that the modeling of coevolutionary interaction between economic and technological evolution is strongly hampered by perception issues. This becomes apparent when we are confronted with novelty, which we cannot account for by our traditional models. I base my argumentation on the further conjecture that economic behavior and technological capabilities can be summarized in the knowledge a social system possesses. This means knowledge and learning processes are seen as the crucial elements in building a model of socio-technological evolution. At first, I will discuss these issues in terms of a general knowledge gaining process, which builds on philosophy of science. I summarize the results in a conceptual flow diagram, which is intended to serve as a preliminary model of technological evolution. Subsequently, I will discuss problems in the modeling of emergent processes. Finally, I discuss some issues relevant to perception.","PeriodicalId":153695,"journal":{"name":"Cognition in Mathematics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1598749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main problem that a scientist encounters in analyzing the interaction between socio-economic and technological evolution is emergence. Emergence denotes the occurrence of unforeseen events, patterns of behavior. Shortly it is the surprise information that derails accepted knowledge. Emergence has been defined as the occurrence of new behaviors and properties on a system level through the interaction of elements that are individually not able to bring about the behavior or properties. Emergence is one of the main properties of evolutionary processes. If emergence is neglected, 'evolutionary' system analysis is reduced to questions of comparatively simple dynamical development. Difficult to treat, but crucial element is interaction. After formalizing the interaction in systems leading to emergence mathematically, Bertalanffy states: 'Physically, these statements are trivial; they could become problematic and lead to confused conceptions in biology, psychology and sociology only because of a misinterpretation of the mechanistic conception, the tendency being towards resolution of phenomena into independent elements and causal chains, while interrelations were bypassed'. This is the problem I want to deal with in the following pages: how can we model emergent phenomena without falling in the trap of reductionism, while at the same time keeping the model simple. To solve the problem just stated, I take the position that the modeling of coevolutionary interaction between economic and technological evolution is strongly hampered by perception issues. This becomes apparent when we are confronted with novelty, which we cannot account for by our traditional models. I base my argumentation on the further conjecture that economic behavior and technological capabilities can be summarized in the knowledge a social system possesses. This means knowledge and learning processes are seen as the crucial elements in building a model of socio-technological evolution. At first, I will discuss these issues in terms of a general knowledge gaining process, which builds on philosophy of science. I summarize the results in a conceptual flow diagram, which is intended to serve as a preliminary model of technological evolution. Subsequently, I will discuss problems in the modeling of emergent processes. Finally, I discuss some issues relevant to perception.
技术进化中的协同进化学习与涌现:建模中的概念问题
科学家在分析社会经济和技术进化之间的相互作用时遇到的主要问题是涌现。涌现是指意外事件的发生,行为模式。简而言之,细节是公认知识的惊喜信息。涌现被定义为在系统层面上,通过单独无法产生行为或属性的元素之间的相互作用,出现新的行为和属性。涌现是进化过程的主要特性之一。如果忽略涌现,“进化”系统分析就会简化为相对简单的动态发展问题。很难治疗,但关键因素是相互作用。在数学上形式化了导致涌现的系统中的相互作用之后,Bertalanffy说:“从物理上讲,这些陈述是微不足道的;它们可能会成为问题,导致生物学、心理学和社会学的概念混乱,只是因为对机械概念的误解,倾向于将现象分解为独立的元素和因果链,而忽略了相互关系。”这就是我想在接下来的几页中处理的问题:我们如何在不落入还原论陷阱的情况下对突发现象进行建模,同时保持模型的简单性。为了解决刚才提到的问题,我认为经济和技术进化之间的共同进化相互作用的建模受到感知问题的严重阻碍。当我们面对传统模式无法解释的新奇事物时,这一点就变得明显了。我的论证基于一个进一步的假设,即经济行为和技术能力可以用一个社会系统所拥有的知识来概括。这意味着知识和学习过程被视为构建社会技术进化模型的关键因素。首先,我将从建立在科学哲学基础上的一般知识获取过程来讨论这些问题。我在一个概念流程图中总结了这些结果,该流程图旨在作为技术进化的初步模型。随后,我将讨论紧急过程建模中的问题。最后,我讨论了一些与感知相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信