Influence of line edge roughness (LER) on angular resolved and on spectroscopic scatterometry

T. Schuster, S. Rafler, K. Frenner, W. Osten
{"title":"Influence of line edge roughness (LER) on angular resolved and on spectroscopic scatterometry","authors":"T. Schuster, S. Rafler, K. Frenner, W. Osten","doi":"10.1117/12.814532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scatterometry or optical CD metrology (OCD) has become one of the most common techniques in quantitative wafer metrology within the recent years. Different tool configurations are either available in commercial inspection tools or subject of recent and present research activities. Among these are normal incidence reflectometry, 2-θ scatterometry, spectroscopic ellipsometry and angle resolved Fourier scatterometry. The two latter techniques appear to be promising for future use in semiconductor fabs. Spectroscopic ellipsometry is well established, and Fourier scatterometry has become of increasing interest within the recent time. Line edge roughness, i.e. an edge position variation of printed lines in lithography, has been of less importance up to now, as its amplitude could largely be neglected with respect to the feature dimensions. This will, however, not be the case for future nodes, as on the one hand CDs are getting smaller and smaller, and on the other hand, even the absolute amplitude is expected to increase due to the higher complexity of lithography and etch processes. In this paper a comparison of scatterometric reconstructions in both spectroscopic and angle resolved techniques considering LER afflicted samples is presented. The validity and benefit of a simple effective medium model is investigated.","PeriodicalId":191475,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Laser Metrology","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Laser Metrology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.814532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Scatterometry or optical CD metrology (OCD) has become one of the most common techniques in quantitative wafer metrology within the recent years. Different tool configurations are either available in commercial inspection tools or subject of recent and present research activities. Among these are normal incidence reflectometry, 2-θ scatterometry, spectroscopic ellipsometry and angle resolved Fourier scatterometry. The two latter techniques appear to be promising for future use in semiconductor fabs. Spectroscopic ellipsometry is well established, and Fourier scatterometry has become of increasing interest within the recent time. Line edge roughness, i.e. an edge position variation of printed lines in lithography, has been of less importance up to now, as its amplitude could largely be neglected with respect to the feature dimensions. This will, however, not be the case for future nodes, as on the one hand CDs are getting smaller and smaller, and on the other hand, even the absolute amplitude is expected to increase due to the higher complexity of lithography and etch processes. In this paper a comparison of scatterometric reconstructions in both spectroscopic and angle resolved techniques considering LER afflicted samples is presented. The validity and benefit of a simple effective medium model is investigated.
线边缘粗糙度对角分辨和光谱散射测量的影响
近年来,散射测量或光学光盘测量(OCD)已成为定量晶圆测量中最常用的技术之一。不同的工具配置可以在商业检查工具或主题最近和目前的研究活动。其中包括正入射反射法、2 θ散射法、光谱椭偏法和角分辨傅立叶散射法。后两种技术在半导体晶圆厂的应用前景很好。光谱椭偏法已经很好地建立了,傅里叶散射法在最近的一段时间里变得越来越有趣。线条边缘粗糙度,即光刻中印刷线条的边缘位置变化,到目前为止一直不太重要,因为它的幅度相对于特征尺寸在很大程度上可以忽略不计。然而,对于未来的节点来说,情况并非如此,因为一方面cd变得越来越小,另一方面,由于光刻和蚀刻工艺的更高复杂性,甚至绝对振幅也有望增加。在本文中,比较了光谱和角分辨两种散射重建技术对LER损伤样品的影响。研究了一种简单有效介质模型的有效性和效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信