Comparison of Ultrasound and Actual Beef Carcass Measurements as Influenced by Stockering Performance and Finishing System

Neel Jps, Swecker Ws, Brown Ma
{"title":"Comparison of Ultrasound and Actual Beef Carcass Measurements as Influenced by Stockering Performance and Finishing System","authors":"Neel Jps, Swecker Ws, Brown Ma","doi":"10.16966/2576-6457.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A total of 216 Angus-crossbred steers (270 ± 19.3) kg were used in a three-year study to assess the effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on beef carcass parameters as measured by ultrasound, a United States Department of Agriculture grader at a commercial slaughter facility, and laboratory analysis. During winter months (December to April) steers were randomly allotted to one three stocker growth rates: low (0.23 kg d-1; LOW), medium (0.45 kg d-1; MED), or high (0.68 kg d-1; HIGH). Upon completion of the winter phase, steers were randomly allotted within each stocker treatment to either a corn silage-concentrate (CONC) or pasture (PAST) finishing system. All steers, regardless of finishing treatment, were finished to an equal-time. Upon completion of the finishing period, steers were ultrasounded to obtain estimates of loin muscle intramuscular fat percent (US-IMF), ribeye area (US-REA), and rib fat (US-RF). Steers were harvested and carcass data collected. Ultrasound-IMF measurement detected a finishing system effect (P<0.0001) but no evident impact of stocker system. Laboratory determined IMF (actual-IMF) resulted in detection of both a stocker treatment and finishing system effect (P<0.05). When actual-IMF and US-IMF were each converted to a USDA quality grade (QG) equivalent, and compared with the USDA grader QG (grader-QG), US-QG and grader-QG over estimated (P<0.05) actual IMF-QG for all treatment subgroups except HIGH-CONC, where USand actual-QG were in agreement. Grader-QG and actual IMF-QG detected both stockering and finishing treatment effects, while US-QG did not. Our results clearly demonstrate that US-IMF measurement was unable to identify changes in loin muscle IMF deposition due to stockering plane of nutrition, whereas laboratory analysis and the USDA grader could identify changes in loin muscle IMF deposition due to stockering plane of nutrition.","PeriodicalId":147546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16966/2576-6457.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A total of 216 Angus-crossbred steers (270 ± 19.3) kg were used in a three-year study to assess the effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on beef carcass parameters as measured by ultrasound, a United States Department of Agriculture grader at a commercial slaughter facility, and laboratory analysis. During winter months (December to April) steers were randomly allotted to one three stocker growth rates: low (0.23 kg d-1; LOW), medium (0.45 kg d-1; MED), or high (0.68 kg d-1; HIGH). Upon completion of the winter phase, steers were randomly allotted within each stocker treatment to either a corn silage-concentrate (CONC) or pasture (PAST) finishing system. All steers, regardless of finishing treatment, were finished to an equal-time. Upon completion of the finishing period, steers were ultrasounded to obtain estimates of loin muscle intramuscular fat percent (US-IMF), ribeye area (US-REA), and rib fat (US-RF). Steers were harvested and carcass data collected. Ultrasound-IMF measurement detected a finishing system effect (P<0.0001) but no evident impact of stocker system. Laboratory determined IMF (actual-IMF) resulted in detection of both a stocker treatment and finishing system effect (P<0.05). When actual-IMF and US-IMF were each converted to a USDA quality grade (QG) equivalent, and compared with the USDA grader QG (grader-QG), US-QG and grader-QG over estimated (P<0.05) actual IMF-QG for all treatment subgroups except HIGH-CONC, where USand actual-QG were in agreement. Grader-QG and actual IMF-QG detected both stockering and finishing treatment effects, while US-QG did not. Our results clearly demonstrate that US-IMF measurement was unable to identify changes in loin muscle IMF deposition due to stockering plane of nutrition, whereas laboratory analysis and the USDA grader could identify changes in loin muscle IMF deposition due to stockering plane of nutrition.
贮藏性能和肥育制度对超声和实际牛肉胴体测量的影响
在一项为期三年的研究中,共使用216头安格斯杂交阉牛(270±19.3)kg),通过超声波、美国农业部在一家商业屠宰场的分级机和实验室分析,评估冬季牲畜生长速度和肥育制度对牛肉胴体参数的影响。在冬季(12月至4月),将阉牛随机分为三组:低生长速率(0.23 kg d-1;低),中(0.45 kg d-1;MED)或高(0.68 kg d-1;高)。冬季阶段结束后,阉牛被随机分配到玉米青贮精料(CONC)或牧场(PAST)育肥系统。所有的舵机,无论最后处理,完成了相同的时间。在完成育肥期后,对阉牛进行超声波检查,以获得腰部肌肉肌内脂肪百分比(US-IMF)、肋眼面积(US-REA)和肋脂肪(US-RF)的估计。收获了阉牛并收集了胴体数据。超声- imf测量检测到整理系统的影响(P<0.0001),但没有明显的影响贮存系统。实验室测定的IMF(实际IMF)可同时检测出储料处理和育肥系统效应(P<0.05)。当实际imf和美国- imf分别转换为美国农业部质量等级(QG)等效,并与美国农业部分级QG(分级-QG)进行比较时,除高conc外,美国-QG和美国-QG高估了所有治疗亚组的实际IMF-QG (P<0.05),美国和实际QG一致。Grader-QG和actual IMF-QG检测到贮藏和精整处理的效果,而US-QG没有检测到。我们的研究结果清楚地表明,US-IMF测量无法识别营养储存面导致的腰部肌肉IMF沉积的变化,而实验室分析和USDA分级器可以识别营养储存面导致的腰部肌肉IMF沉积的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信