Evidence at the Centre Stage Bridging Theory-Practice Gap in Testing

S. Parashar, Priyanka Sharma
{"title":"Evidence at the Centre Stage Bridging Theory-Practice Gap in Testing","authors":"S. Parashar, Priyanka Sharma","doi":"10.33422/ireconf.2019.07.439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the significance and usage of variety of evidence from various sources, at different stages of educational testing to improve the quality of the test, especially validity of the decision drawn on the basis of the test scores about test takers. It is not limited to, but briefly touches the principle and practices of Evidence-Centered Design (ECD), and tries to establish linkages at various points of the testing cycle. While emphasizing the need of evidence-based approach of test development and interpretation of test scores, the paper also argues in favour of rigour-relevance balance. It extends to using evidence from measurement models from Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. However the intent is not just an academic review or psychometric analyses, but to produce usable evidence and present evidence in simpler form to users, who may be great subject experts and instruction designers or policy makers, but may not be great measurement experts.","PeriodicalId":347644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Innovative Research in Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The International Conference on Innovative Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/ireconf.2019.07.439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses the significance and usage of variety of evidence from various sources, at different stages of educational testing to improve the quality of the test, especially validity of the decision drawn on the basis of the test scores about test takers. It is not limited to, but briefly touches the principle and practices of Evidence-Centered Design (ECD), and tries to establish linkages at various points of the testing cycle. While emphasizing the need of evidence-based approach of test development and interpretation of test scores, the paper also argues in favour of rigour-relevance balance. It extends to using evidence from measurement models from Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. However the intent is not just an academic review or psychometric analyses, but to produce usable evidence and present evidence in simpler form to users, who may be great subject experts and instruction designers or policy makers, but may not be great measurement experts.
证据在中心阶段弥合测试理论与实践的差距
本文讨论了在教育考试的不同阶段,各种来源的证据对提高考试质量的意义和用途,特别是根据考试成绩对考生作出决定的有效性。它不限于,但简要地触及了以证据为中心的设计(ECD)的原则和实践,并试图在测试周期的各个点建立联系。在强调测试开发和测试分数解释的循证方法的需要的同时,本文还主张支持严格相关性平衡。它扩展到使用经典测试理论和项目反应理论的测量模型的证据。然而,其目的不仅仅是学术评论或心理测量分析,而是产生可用的证据,并以更简单的形式向用户呈现证据,这些用户可能是伟大的学科专家、指导设计师或政策制定者,但可能不是伟大的测量专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信