Feasibility and safety in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies; a single surgeon experience.

Muhammad Saad Faisal, Sikandar Ali, M. A. Channa
{"title":"Feasibility and safety in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies; a single surgeon experience.","authors":"Muhammad Saad Faisal, Sikandar Ali, M. A. Channa","doi":"10.47883/JSZMC.V11I04.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: laparoscopic cholecystectomy is commonly used for the treatment of gallstones.\n\nObjective: To determine the feasibility and safety of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies.\n\nMethodology: This cross sectional study was based on retrospective collection of data from patient records, including 323 patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies was conducted in Department of Surgery, Sharif Medical City Hospital, and Rasheed Hospital, Lahore from June 2010 to December 2019. Difficult cholecystectomy was defined on intraoperative findings based on Nassar intraoperative scoring system. Feasibility was defined as successful accomplishment of procedure without complication and safety was defined as having no intraoperative or postoperative complications.\n\nResults: There were 75 (23.21%) male and mean age was 48±8 years. Class I difficulty was observed in 185 (57.3%) patients, class II difficulty in 83 (25.7%) patients, class III difficulty in 44 (13.6%) patients and class IV difficulty in 11 (3.4%) patients. Mean duration of surgery and mean hospital stay were 98.87±11.76 minutes and 1.91±1 days, respectively. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was done in 10 (3.1%). The procedure was feasible in 313 (96.9%) patients. Overall complications were seen in 19 (5.9%) patients. The complications included Common Bile Duct injury in 1 (0.31%) patient, intraoperative bleeding in 1 (0.3%) patients, bile leakage in 2 (0.62%) patients, postoperative jaundice in 3 (0.93%) patients, superficial infections in 10 (3.1%) patients and deep infections in 2 (0.62%) patients. Safety of laparoscopic surgery was seen in 304 (94.1%) patients.\n\nConclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in difficult situations was found to be feasible and safe in majority of patients. However, it was associated with a longer operative time.","PeriodicalId":171893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sheikh Zayed Medical College","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sheikh Zayed Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47883/JSZMC.V11I04.149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: laparoscopic cholecystectomy is commonly used for the treatment of gallstones. Objective: To determine the feasibility and safety of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Methodology: This cross sectional study was based on retrospective collection of data from patient records, including 323 patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies was conducted in Department of Surgery, Sharif Medical City Hospital, and Rasheed Hospital, Lahore from June 2010 to December 2019. Difficult cholecystectomy was defined on intraoperative findings based on Nassar intraoperative scoring system. Feasibility was defined as successful accomplishment of procedure without complication and safety was defined as having no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Results: There were 75 (23.21%) male and mean age was 48±8 years. Class I difficulty was observed in 185 (57.3%) patients, class II difficulty in 83 (25.7%) patients, class III difficulty in 44 (13.6%) patients and class IV difficulty in 11 (3.4%) patients. Mean duration of surgery and mean hospital stay were 98.87±11.76 minutes and 1.91±1 days, respectively. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was done in 10 (3.1%). The procedure was feasible in 313 (96.9%) patients. Overall complications were seen in 19 (5.9%) patients. The complications included Common Bile Duct injury in 1 (0.31%) patient, intraoperative bleeding in 1 (0.3%) patients, bile leakage in 2 (0.62%) patients, postoperative jaundice in 3 (0.93%) patients, superficial infections in 10 (3.1%) patients and deep infections in 2 (0.62%) patients. Safety of laparoscopic surgery was seen in 304 (94.1%) patients. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in difficult situations was found to be feasible and safe in majority of patients. However, it was associated with a longer operative time.
腹腔镜下困难胆囊切除术的可行性及安全性一个外科医生的经验。
背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是治疗胆结石的常用方法。目的:探讨腹腔镜下困难胆囊切除术的可行性和安全性。方法:本横断面研究基于回顾性收集病历数据,包括2010年6月至2019年12月在拉合尔谢里夫医学城医院和拉希德医院外科进行的323例困难的腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者。基于Nassar术中评分系统,根据术中表现定义胆囊切除术困难。可行性定义为手术成功完成且无并发症,安全性定义为无术中或术后并发症。结果:男性75例(23.21%),平均年龄48±8岁。I级困难185例(57.3%),II级困难83例(25.7%),III级困难44例(13.6%),IV级困难11例(3.4%)。平均手术时间为98.87±11.76分钟,平均住院时间为1.91±1天。10例(3.1%)转为开腹胆囊切除术。313例(96.9%)患者手术可行。19例(5.9%)出现并发症。并发症包括胆总管损伤1例(0.31%),术中出血1例(0.3%),胆漏2例(0.62%),术后黄疸3例(0.93%),浅表感染10例(3.1%),深部感染2例(0.62%)。304例(94.1%)患者有腹腔镜手术的安全性。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术在困难情况下是可行和安全的。然而,它与较长的手术时间有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信