"Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Local Infusion Analgesia, Femoral Nerve Block and Intrathecal Morphine"

Christopher J Wilson
{"title":"\"Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Local Infusion Analgesia, Femoral Nerve Block and Intrathecal Morphine\"","authors":"Christopher J Wilson","doi":"10.38125/oajbs.000403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"peripheral nerve blockade, ABSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of continuous intra-articular local infiltration analgesia, femoral nerve block and intrathecal morphine for the management of post-operative pain and early function following total knee arthroplasty. Methods: group, double blinded, randomized controlled pilot trial was undertaken. Patients were randomized to receive either local infiltration analgesia, femoral nerve block or intrathecal morphine for post-operative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. The efficacy of analgesia was determined by recording post-operative pain visual analogue scores, opiate requirements and side effects, and functional scores at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 6 weeks post-operatively. Results: 45 patients were recruited to the study. 4 were excluded due to voluntary withdrawal and incomplete follow-up. The final analysis included 13 patients randomized to the local infiltration analgesia group, 14 patients to the femoral nerve block group and 14 patients to the intrathecal morphine group. There were no significant differences in post-operative pain scores, opiate requirements and associated side effects, or functional scores at any point during the study period. Conclusion: This study did not identify any significant differences between continuous intra-articular local infiltration analgesia, femoral nerve block and intrathecal morphine for delivering post-operative an-algesia following total knee arthroplasty.","PeriodicalId":207626,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38125/oajbs.000403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

peripheral nerve blockade, ABSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of continuous intra-articular local infiltration analgesia, femoral nerve block and intrathecal morphine for the management of post-operative pain and early function following total knee arthroplasty. Methods: group, double blinded, randomized controlled pilot trial was undertaken. Patients were randomized to receive either local infiltration analgesia, femoral nerve block or intrathecal morphine for post-operative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. The efficacy of analgesia was determined by recording post-operative pain visual analogue scores, opiate requirements and side effects, and functional scores at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 6 weeks post-operatively. Results: 45 patients were recruited to the study. 4 were excluded due to voluntary withdrawal and incomplete follow-up. The final analysis included 13 patients randomized to the local infiltration analgesia group, 14 patients to the femoral nerve block group and 14 patients to the intrathecal morphine group. There were no significant differences in post-operative pain scores, opiate requirements and associated side effects, or functional scores at any point during the study period. Conclusion: This study did not identify any significant differences between continuous intra-articular local infiltration analgesia, femoral nerve block and intrathecal morphine for delivering post-operative an-algesia following total knee arthroplasty.
全膝关节置换术的镇痛:一项比较局部输液镇痛、股神经阻滞和鞘内吗啡的随机对照研究
简介:本研究的目的是比较连续关节内局部浸润镇痛、股神经阻滞和鞘内吗啡对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和早期功能的治疗效果。方法:采用分组、双盲、随机对照试验。患者随机接受局部浸润镇痛、股神经阻滞或鞘内吗啡用于全膝关节置换术后的术后镇痛。通过术后24小时、48小时和6周记录疼痛视觉模拟评分、阿片类药物需求和副作用以及功能评分来确定镇痛效果。结果:45例患者被纳入研究。4例因自愿退出和随访不完全被排除。最终将13例患者随机分为局部浸润镇痛组、股神经阻滞组14例、鞘内吗啡组14例。在研究期间的任何时间点,术后疼痛评分、阿片类药物需求和相关副作用或功能评分均无显著差异。结论:本研究未发现持续关节内局部浸润镇痛、股神经阻滞和鞘内吗啡在全膝关节置换术后镇痛中的差异有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信