LONG-TERM FORECASTING IN THE US: INSTITUTIONAL ASPECT

S. Kislitsyn
{"title":"LONG-TERM FORECASTING IN THE US: INSTITUTIONAL ASPECT","authors":"S. Kislitsyn","doi":"10.20542/afij-2019-2-23-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the institutional aspects of American forecasting. Most attention is paid to non-governmental scientific organizations. The research is based on materials of leading US organizations and expert interviews. The first part of the study is devoted to the development of predictive researches in the US in 1950–1980. This period was expressed by works of RAND Corporation, World Future Society, Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies, Huston University and others. An increase in the complexity and universality of forecasts has led to further inclusion of representatives from various target audiences. Forecasts have included issues of the social, legal and ethical agenda. More attention was paid to problems of education, employment, and redistribution of resources. The second part of this study is devoted to modern organizations and new methodologies. A current generation of forecasters is represented by the National Intelligence Council and its research “Global Trends\". The Millennium Project is another important organization. It provides an integrated and constantly updated forecast “State of the Future”. Attention is also paid to the Association of professional futurists. At the end of the study, three main conclusions are made. Firstly, an accurate prediction of future trends is not the main forecasting goal. The main task is to create a reasoned view of the future world. Secondly, there is no clear separation between forecasting and foresight which is a further development of predictive research. It uses an interdisciplinary approach and includes current economic, technological and social trends. Thirdly, the attraction of a wide range of experts (including foreign ones) increases the objectivity. This also affects the institutional structure of US organizations. The internationalization of forecasting has a scientific effect and contributes to the credibility of American institutions and the US “soft power”. About author:  Sergey V. KISLITSYN, Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Research Associate, Sector of US Foreign and Domestic Policy, Center for North American Studies.","PeriodicalId":405984,"journal":{"name":"Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis and Forecasting. IMEMO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2019-2-23-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article is devoted to the institutional aspects of American forecasting. Most attention is paid to non-governmental scientific organizations. The research is based on materials of leading US organizations and expert interviews. The first part of the study is devoted to the development of predictive researches in the US in 1950–1980. This period was expressed by works of RAND Corporation, World Future Society, Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies, Huston University and others. An increase in the complexity and universality of forecasts has led to further inclusion of representatives from various target audiences. Forecasts have included issues of the social, legal and ethical agenda. More attention was paid to problems of education, employment, and redistribution of resources. The second part of this study is devoted to modern organizations and new methodologies. A current generation of forecasters is represented by the National Intelligence Council and its research “Global Trends". The Millennium Project is another important organization. It provides an integrated and constantly updated forecast “State of the Future”. Attention is also paid to the Association of professional futurists. At the end of the study, three main conclusions are made. Firstly, an accurate prediction of future trends is not the main forecasting goal. The main task is to create a reasoned view of the future world. Secondly, there is no clear separation between forecasting and foresight which is a further development of predictive research. It uses an interdisciplinary approach and includes current economic, technological and social trends. Thirdly, the attraction of a wide range of experts (including foreign ones) increases the objectivity. This also affects the institutional structure of US organizations. The internationalization of forecasting has a scientific effect and contributes to the credibility of American institutions and the US “soft power”. About author:  Sergey V. KISLITSYN, Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Research Associate, Sector of US Foreign and Domestic Policy, Center for North American Studies.
美国的长期预测:制度方面
这篇文章致力于美国预测的制度方面。非政府科学组织受到的关注最多。该研究基于美国领先组织的材料和专家访谈。研究的第一部分是1950-1980年美国预测研究的发展。这一时期体现在兰德公司、世界未来学会、夏威夷未来研究中心、休斯顿大学等人的著作中。由于预测的复杂性和普遍性的增加,进一步纳入了来自不同目标受众的代表。预测包括社会、法律和道德议程问题。教育、就业、资源再分配等问题得到更多关注。本研究的第二部分致力于现代组织和新方法。当前这一代预测者以美国国家情报委员会(National Intelligence Council)及其研究报告《全球趋势》(Global Trends)为代表。千年计划是另一个重要的组织。它提供了一个综合的和不断更新的预测“未来的状态”。专业未来学家协会也受到关注。在研究的最后,得出了三个主要结论。首先,对未来趋势的准确预测并不是预测的主要目标。主要任务是对未来世界建立一个理性的看法。二是预测与预见的界限不清,这是预测研究的进一步发展。它采用跨学科的方法,包括当前的经济、技术和社会趋势。第三,广泛的专家(包括外国专家)的吸引增加了客观性。这也影响了美国组织的制度结构。预测的国际化具有科学效果,有助于提高美国机构的可信度和美国的“软实力”。作者简介:Sergey V. KISLITSYN,加拿大。科学。(政治学),北美研究中心美国外交与国内政策部研究员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信