A comparative analysis of SVM and its stacking with other classification algorithm for intrusion detection

N. Chand, P. Mishra, C. Rama Krishna, E. Pilli, Mahesh Chandra Govil
{"title":"A comparative analysis of SVM and its stacking with other classification algorithm for intrusion detection","authors":"N. Chand, P. Mishra, C. Rama Krishna, E. Pilli, Mahesh Chandra Govil","doi":"10.1109/ICACCA.2016.7578859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network attacks have become more pervasive in the cyber world. There are various attacks such as denial of service, scanning, privilege escalation that is increasing day by day leading towards the requirement of a more robust and adaptable security techniques. Anomaly detection is the main focus of our paper. Support Vector Machine (SVM) is one of the good classification algorithm applied specially for intrusion detection. However, its performance can be significantly improved when it is applied in integration with other classifiers. In this paper, we have performed a comparative analysis of SVM classifier's performance when it is stacked with other classifiers like BayesNet, AdaBoost, Logistic, IBK, J48, RandomForest, JRip, OneR and SimpleCart. Multi-Classifier algorithm have better classification power when compared to a single classifier algorithm specially for detecting low frequency attacks such as guess password, rootkits, spyware etc. Our preliminary analysis over NSL-KDD'99 dataset shows that stacking of SVM and Random Forest provides the best performance with accuracy of around 97.50% which apparently better than SVM (91.81%).","PeriodicalId":109549,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, & Automation (ICACCA) (Spring)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, & Automation (ICACCA) (Spring)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCA.2016.7578859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

Network attacks have become more pervasive in the cyber world. There are various attacks such as denial of service, scanning, privilege escalation that is increasing day by day leading towards the requirement of a more robust and adaptable security techniques. Anomaly detection is the main focus of our paper. Support Vector Machine (SVM) is one of the good classification algorithm applied specially for intrusion detection. However, its performance can be significantly improved when it is applied in integration with other classifiers. In this paper, we have performed a comparative analysis of SVM classifier's performance when it is stacked with other classifiers like BayesNet, AdaBoost, Logistic, IBK, J48, RandomForest, JRip, OneR and SimpleCart. Multi-Classifier algorithm have better classification power when compared to a single classifier algorithm specially for detecting low frequency attacks such as guess password, rootkits, spyware etc. Our preliminary analysis over NSL-KDD'99 dataset shows that stacking of SVM and Random Forest provides the best performance with accuracy of around 97.50% which apparently better than SVM (91.81%).
对支持向量机及其与其他入侵检测分类算法的叠加进行了比较分析
网络攻击在网络世界中变得越来越普遍。有各种各样的攻击,如拒绝服务、扫描、特权升级,这些攻击每天都在增加,导致对更健壮和适应性更强的安全技术的需求。异常检测是本文研究的重点。支持向量机(SVM)是一种很好的专门用于入侵检测的分类算法。然而,当它与其他分类器集成时,它的性能可以得到显着提高。在本文中,我们对SVM分类器与其他分类器(如BayesNet, AdaBoost, Logistic, IBK, J48, RandomForest, JRip, OneR和SimpleCart)叠加时的性能进行了比较分析。与单一分类器算法相比,多分类器算法具有更好的分类能力,特别是用于检测低频攻击,如猜密码、rootkit、间谍软件等。我们对NSL-KDD'99数据集的初步分析表明,SVM与随机森林的叠加效果最好,准确率约为97.50%,明显优于支持向量机(91.81%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书