Assessing quality of sleep, its functional outcome and excessive day time sleepiness in shift workers and non-shift workers

Sanjeet Krishna Shresth, Sanjeev Shrestha, L. Sharma, Trilok Shrivastava, Rinki Mahaseth, A. Neopane
{"title":"Assessing quality of sleep, its functional outcome and excessive day time sleepiness in shift workers and non-shift workers","authors":"Sanjeet Krishna Shresth, Sanjeev Shrestha, L. Sharma, Trilok Shrivastava, Rinki Mahaseth, A. Neopane","doi":"10.3126/jaim.v8i1.27999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Shift work has been growing more prevalence and involves irregular working hours when compared to daytime work schedule. This study aims to assess sleep quality, its functional outcome, excessive daytime sleepiness and incidence of obstructive sleep apnea between shift and non-shift workers. \nMethods: The study candidates were randomly drawn Nepalese, from age 18 years and older, and were enrolled between January 2018 to January 2019. The subjects were divided into either: Shift work or Non-Shift work. The assessment measures were done with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP-BANG and FOSQ-10 (Functional Outcome of Sleep Quality – 10), using a standard form. \nResults: A total of 358 participants were included in the main study (176 Non-shift workers, and 182 Shift-workers). The mean BMI among the two group were not significantly different (p =0.43). There was significant difference with 25% Non-Shift workers and 41.21% of Shift workers were found to have Abnormal Sleepiness in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (p=0.004). Shift workers showed comparatively higher values for Epworth Sleepiness scale compared to Non-Shift workers in Mann-Whitney analysis, with mean rank 194.11 versus 164.39, respectively, p=0.006. Similarly, 26.29% Non-Shift workers and 36.72% Shift workers were found to have abnormal FOSQ-10 scores, χ2 (1) =4.44, p=0.035. 7.95% of Non-Shift workers and 6.59% of Shift-workers were found to have high risk of OSA in STOP BANG questionnaire, with no significant association, p=0.725. \nConclusions: Shift work caused excessive daytime sleepiness and had worse functional outcome but did not increase probability of obstructive sleep apnea.","PeriodicalId":374721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jaim.v8i1.27999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Shift work has been growing more prevalence and involves irregular working hours when compared to daytime work schedule. This study aims to assess sleep quality, its functional outcome, excessive daytime sleepiness and incidence of obstructive sleep apnea between shift and non-shift workers. Methods: The study candidates were randomly drawn Nepalese, from age 18 years and older, and were enrolled between January 2018 to January 2019. The subjects were divided into either: Shift work or Non-Shift work. The assessment measures were done with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), STOP-BANG and FOSQ-10 (Functional Outcome of Sleep Quality – 10), using a standard form. Results: A total of 358 participants were included in the main study (176 Non-shift workers, and 182 Shift-workers). The mean BMI among the two group were not significantly different (p =0.43). There was significant difference with 25% Non-Shift workers and 41.21% of Shift workers were found to have Abnormal Sleepiness in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (p=0.004). Shift workers showed comparatively higher values for Epworth Sleepiness scale compared to Non-Shift workers in Mann-Whitney analysis, with mean rank 194.11 versus 164.39, respectively, p=0.006. Similarly, 26.29% Non-Shift workers and 36.72% Shift workers were found to have abnormal FOSQ-10 scores, χ2 (1) =4.44, p=0.035. 7.95% of Non-Shift workers and 6.59% of Shift-workers were found to have high risk of OSA in STOP BANG questionnaire, with no significant association, p=0.725. Conclusions: Shift work caused excessive daytime sleepiness and had worse functional outcome but did not increase probability of obstructive sleep apnea.
评估轮班工人和非轮班工人的睡眠质量、功能结果和白天过度嗜睡
背景和目的:与白天工作计划相比,轮班工作越来越普遍,工作时间不规律。本研究旨在评估轮班和非轮班工人的睡眠质量、功能结果、白天过度嗜睡和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的发生率。方法:研究对象是随机抽取的尼泊尔人,年龄在18岁及以上,于2018年1月至2019年1月入组。受试者被分为两组:轮班工作和非轮班工作。评估方法采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)、STOP-BANG和FOSQ-10(睡眠质量功能结果-10),采用标准表格。结果:主研究共纳入358名参与者(176名非轮班工作者和182名轮班工作者)。两组患者BMI均值差异无统计学意义(p =0.43)。Epworth嗜睡量表得分中有25%的非轮班工人和41.21%的轮班工人存在异常嗜睡,差异有统计学意义(p=0.004)。在Mann-Whitney分析中,倒班工人的Epworth困倦量表值相对于非倒班工人较高,平均排名分别为194.11比164.39,p=0.006。非轮班工人和轮班工人中FOSQ-10得分异常的比例分别为26.29%和36.72%,χ2 (1) =4.44, p=0.035。在STOP BANG问卷中,7.95%的非轮班工人和6.59%的轮班工人存在高OSA风险,但无显著相关性,p=0.725。结论:倒班工作会导致白天过度嗜睡,并有较差的功能结局,但不会增加阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信