Accuracy of Working Length Determination In Primary Molar Teeth Using Three Different Methods: An Invitro Study

S. Pol, F. Katge, M. Poojari, Shilpa Shetty, D. Patil
{"title":"Accuracy of Working Length Determination In Primary Molar Teeth Using Three Different Methods: An Invitro Study","authors":"S. Pol, F. Katge, M. Poojari, Shilpa Shetty, D. Patil","doi":"10.56136/nhdcjcd/2021_00002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An accurate working length plays a pivotal role for the success of treatment in endodontics. It involves a wide array of procedures. Aim: Use of digital radiovisiography (RVG), apex locator (EAL) and cone beam computed tomography technique (CBCT) to evaluate working length in primary teeth. Materials and Methods: This study included thirty extracted primary teeth having at least 2/3rd of root. Alginate was combined with 0.9% normal saline solution and teeth were inserted in it after access opening. Two qualified examiners recorded working length for all canals twice with RVG, EAL and CBCT. In control group, a Kerr- file from coronal reference to the apical foramen was used to visually determine the actual (AL) under stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman analysis were used to calculate the agreement on measurements of all methods using actual values of different methods. Results: Electronic working length measured with AL (0.0007) was statistically significant compared to RVG (1.9570) and CBCT (0.8440). Amongst all methods for determination of working length the ICC showed the highest reliability for EAL and least for RVG. Conclusion: In comparison to RVG and CBCT, the EALperformed the best for determining working length in primary teeth.","PeriodicalId":162541,"journal":{"name":"Nair Hospital Dental college Journal of Contemporary Dentistry","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nair Hospital Dental college Journal of Contemporary Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56136/nhdcjcd/2021_00002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An accurate working length plays a pivotal role for the success of treatment in endodontics. It involves a wide array of procedures. Aim: Use of digital radiovisiography (RVG), apex locator (EAL) and cone beam computed tomography technique (CBCT) to evaluate working length in primary teeth. Materials and Methods: This study included thirty extracted primary teeth having at least 2/3rd of root. Alginate was combined with 0.9% normal saline solution and teeth were inserted in it after access opening. Two qualified examiners recorded working length for all canals twice with RVG, EAL and CBCT. In control group, a Kerr- file from coronal reference to the apical foramen was used to visually determine the actual (AL) under stereomicroscope. Statistical analysis: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman analysis were used to calculate the agreement on measurements of all methods using actual values of different methods. Results: Electronic working length measured with AL (0.0007) was statistically significant compared to RVG (1.9570) and CBCT (0.8440). Amongst all methods for determination of working length the ICC showed the highest reliability for EAL and least for RVG. Conclusion: In comparison to RVG and CBCT, the EALperformed the best for determining working length in primary teeth.
三种方法测定初级磨牙工作长度准确性的体外研究
背景:准确的工作长度对牙髓学治疗的成功起着至关重要的作用。它涉及一系列广泛的程序。目的:应用数字放射成像(RVG)、尖端定位仪(EAL)和锥形束计算机断层扫描技术(CBCT)评估乳牙的工作长度。材料和方法:本研究包括30颗拔牙,至少有2/3的根。海藻酸盐与0.9%生理盐水混合,在通道打开后插入牙齿。两名合格的检查员用RVG、EAL和CBCT记录了两次所有管道的工作长度。对照组在体视显微镜下采用冠状参考点至根尖孔的Kerr锉目测实际AL。统计分析:采用类内相关系数(Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)和Bland and Altman分析,利用不同方法的实际值计算各方法测量值的一致性。结果:与RVG(1.9570)和CBCT(0.8440)相比,AL测量的电子工作长度(0.0007)有统计学意义。在所有确定工作长度的方法中,ICC对EAL的可靠性最高,对RVG的可靠性最低。结论:与RVG和CBCT相比,eal是确定乳牙工作长度的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信