Comparing Treatment Modalities For Juvenile Delinquency

Jennifer Innocenti
{"title":"Comparing Treatment Modalities For Juvenile Delinquency","authors":"Jennifer Innocenti","doi":"10.55138/sq104284jin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Juvenile delinquency has improved by 65 percent from 1980 through 2016. The criminal justice system has explored various means of treating juvenile delinquents over the years to improve recidivism rates and to give youth a rewarding adult life. Most juvenile delinquency programs use a Usual Community Service (UCS) treatment method while the youth are incarcerated or immediately after release. UCS uses cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques to help the juvenile link their thoughts and behaviors. While Short-term Behavioral Therapy did not take off with the public or juvenile justice system, Multisystemic Therapy (MST) has showed progress in reducing recidivism of juvenile offenders. Studies have found that engaging the family in the treatment process has contributed to the reduced recidivism rates. For example, participants that enrolled in the UCS treatment modality had an increased recidivism rate of 75 percent while 29.2 percent of the group members from the MST recidivated within a year. At the end of a longitudinal study (8.9 years), researchers found that juveniles who received UCS treatment re-offended with a sex crime 45.8 percent and 58.3 percent re-offended for non-sexual crimes. After incarceration, 24 families participated in the MST treatment model. After a year, 8.3 percent re-offended for a sex crime and 29.2 percent re-offended with a non-sexual crime. Therefore, a family-based therapy model is salient to reduce recidivism compared to CBT based. This paper employs a meta-analysis and statistical analysis of seminal knowledge and law enforcement reports to construct the importance of effective therapeutic treatments by comparing treatment modalities for juvenile delinquents. Keywords: Juvenile Delinquency, Youth, Usual Community Service, Short-term Behavioral, Therapy, Systems Theory, Multisystemic Therapy, Recidivism, Antisocial Behavior","PeriodicalId":297709,"journal":{"name":"The Interdisciplinary Journal of Advances in Research in Education","volume":"23 1-2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Interdisciplinary Journal of Advances in Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55138/sq104284jin","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Juvenile delinquency has improved by 65 percent from 1980 through 2016. The criminal justice system has explored various means of treating juvenile delinquents over the years to improve recidivism rates and to give youth a rewarding adult life. Most juvenile delinquency programs use a Usual Community Service (UCS) treatment method while the youth are incarcerated or immediately after release. UCS uses cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques to help the juvenile link their thoughts and behaviors. While Short-term Behavioral Therapy did not take off with the public or juvenile justice system, Multisystemic Therapy (MST) has showed progress in reducing recidivism of juvenile offenders. Studies have found that engaging the family in the treatment process has contributed to the reduced recidivism rates. For example, participants that enrolled in the UCS treatment modality had an increased recidivism rate of 75 percent while 29.2 percent of the group members from the MST recidivated within a year. At the end of a longitudinal study (8.9 years), researchers found that juveniles who received UCS treatment re-offended with a sex crime 45.8 percent and 58.3 percent re-offended for non-sexual crimes. After incarceration, 24 families participated in the MST treatment model. After a year, 8.3 percent re-offended for a sex crime and 29.2 percent re-offended with a non-sexual crime. Therefore, a family-based therapy model is salient to reduce recidivism compared to CBT based. This paper employs a meta-analysis and statistical analysis of seminal knowledge and law enforcement reports to construct the importance of effective therapeutic treatments by comparing treatment modalities for juvenile delinquents. Keywords: Juvenile Delinquency, Youth, Usual Community Service, Short-term Behavioral, Therapy, Systems Theory, Multisystemic Therapy, Recidivism, Antisocial Behavior
青少年犯罪的治疗方式比较
从1980年到2016年,青少年犯罪减少了65%。多年来,刑事司法系统探索了多种对待少年犯的方式,以提高再犯率,使青少年有一个有意义的成年生活。大多数青少年犯罪项目在青少年被监禁期间或释放后立即使用常规社区服务(UCS)治疗方法。UCS使用认知行为疗法(CBT)技术来帮助青少年将他们的思想和行为联系起来。虽然短期行为疗法并没有在公共或青少年司法系统中获得成功,但多系统疗法(MST)在减少少年犯的再犯方面取得了进展。研究发现,让家人参与治疗过程有助于降低再犯率。例如,参加UCS治疗模式的参与者的再犯率增加了75%,而来自MST的小组成员中有29.2%的人在一年内再犯。在一项长达8.9年的纵向研究结束时,研究人员发现,接受UCS治疗的青少年再犯性犯罪的比例为45.8%,再犯非性犯罪的比例为58.3%。监禁后,24个家庭参与了MST治疗模式。一年后,8.3%的人因性犯罪再次犯罪,29.2%的人因非性犯罪再次犯罪。因此,与基于CBT的治疗模式相比,以家庭为基础的治疗模式在减少再犯方面显着。本文采用元分析和统计分析的方法,通过比较青少年犯罪的治疗方式,构建有效治疗的重要性。关键词:青少年犯罪,青少年,普通社区服务,短期行为,治疗,系统理论,多系统治疗,再犯,反社会行为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信