Representative Safety Assessment of Autonomous Vehicle for Public Transportation

Morayo Adedjouma, Gabriel Pedroza, Boutheina Bannour
{"title":"Representative Safety Assessment of Autonomous Vehicle for Public Transportation","authors":"Morayo Adedjouma, Gabriel Pedroza, Boutheina Bannour","doi":"10.1109/ISORC.2018.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementations and testing in real conditions of Autonomous Vehicles (AV) for private usage show important advances. However, a lack still exists in addressing the particularities of AVs for Public Transportation. Such particularities range from limited safety mechanisms aboard, risky situations associated to particular users and complex self-driving situations up to the limited passengers-vehicle interactions possible. Since, to our knowledge, no comprehensive safety assessment actually exists and the current automotive related standards do not address identified aspects, in this paper, we propose to conduct a minimal but representative safety assessment based upon a local but real autonomous vehicle implementation. To conduct our study, the Hazard Analysis and Risks Assessment introduced in the ISO 26262 standard is taken as a basis. Initial outcomes suggest that critical autonomy aspects, like machine learning of complex operational situations, the metrics for quantitative assessment of autonomy, and potential conflicts between autonomy principles and external safety fences can have critical safety impacts and demand further discussions.","PeriodicalId":395536,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2018.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The implementations and testing in real conditions of Autonomous Vehicles (AV) for private usage show important advances. However, a lack still exists in addressing the particularities of AVs for Public Transportation. Such particularities range from limited safety mechanisms aboard, risky situations associated to particular users and complex self-driving situations up to the limited passengers-vehicle interactions possible. Since, to our knowledge, no comprehensive safety assessment actually exists and the current automotive related standards do not address identified aspects, in this paper, we propose to conduct a minimal but representative safety assessment based upon a local but real autonomous vehicle implementation. To conduct our study, the Hazard Analysis and Risks Assessment introduced in the ISO 26262 standard is taken as a basis. Initial outcomes suggest that critical autonomy aspects, like machine learning of complex operational situations, the metrics for quantitative assessment of autonomy, and potential conflicts between autonomy principles and external safety fences can have critical safety impacts and demand further discussions.
公共交通自动驾驶车辆代表性安全评价
自动驾驶汽车(AV)在私人使用的实际条件下的实现和测试显示出重要的进展。然而,在解决公共交通自动驾驶汽车的特殊性方面仍然存在不足。这些特殊性包括有限的安全机制,与特定用户和复杂的自动驾驶情况相关的危险情况,以及有限的乘客与车辆可能的互动。由于据我们所知,目前还没有全面的安全评估,而且目前的汽车相关标准也没有解决所识别的方面,因此在本文中,我们建议基于本地但真实的自动驾驶汽车实施进行最小但具有代表性的安全评估。为了进行研究,我们以ISO 26262标准中的危害分析和风险评估为基础。初步结果表明,关键的自主性方面,如复杂操作情况的机器学习、自主性定量评估的指标,以及自主性原则与外部安全围栏之间的潜在冲突,都可能对安全产生关键影响,需要进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信