International Legal Perspective on the Implementation of the Death Penalty Case Study of Mary Jane Fiesta Veloso

Ananda Ima Saputri
{"title":"International Legal Perspective on the Implementation of the Death Penalty Case Study of Mary Jane Fiesta Veloso","authors":"Ananda Ima Saputri","doi":"10.15294/digest.v1i2.48628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mary Jane, a citizen from the Philippines, was arrested on April 25, 2010 by the police at Adi Sutjipto Airport, Yogyakarta, for her efforts to smuggle 2.6 kilograms of Heroin. In this case, finally in October Marry Jane was sentenced to death by the Sleman District Court on charges of violating Article 114 paragraph 2 of Law Number 35 Year 2009 Regarding Narcotics. Mary Jane sent clemency, which was rejected by President Jokowi. Mary Jane then tried to submit the Judicial Review (PK) and the PK session where the Sleman District Court decided to forward the Mary PK to the Supreme Court (MA). From this there are the main issues raised in this paper namely how international legal review responds to the death penalty that still occurs in several countries, especially Indonesia in Narcotics crime cases and what is the legal basis for the death sentence for drug dealers. The purpose of writing this paper is to increase knowledge of the legality of the death penalty in terms of human rights and international law. This writing uses a research method conducted by studying and analyzing legal materials and related legal issues. Through international legal instruments as in Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), Article 6 paragraph (1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and in the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which are protocols additional to the ICCPR which obliges participating countries to ban the implementation of the death penalty and abolish the death penalty. However, the results of the study show that the application of the death penalty for Narcotics crimes must be carried out to protect the public by capital punishment for Narcotics offenders which does not conflict with human rights and international conventions of civil and political rights so that the death penalty can be applied in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":141082,"journal":{"name":"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/digest.v1i2.48628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mary Jane, a citizen from the Philippines, was arrested on April 25, 2010 by the police at Adi Sutjipto Airport, Yogyakarta, for her efforts to smuggle 2.6 kilograms of Heroin. In this case, finally in October Marry Jane was sentenced to death by the Sleman District Court on charges of violating Article 114 paragraph 2 of Law Number 35 Year 2009 Regarding Narcotics. Mary Jane sent clemency, which was rejected by President Jokowi. Mary Jane then tried to submit the Judicial Review (PK) and the PK session where the Sleman District Court decided to forward the Mary PK to the Supreme Court (MA). From this there are the main issues raised in this paper namely how international legal review responds to the death penalty that still occurs in several countries, especially Indonesia in Narcotics crime cases and what is the legal basis for the death sentence for drug dealers. The purpose of writing this paper is to increase knowledge of the legality of the death penalty in terms of human rights and international law. This writing uses a research method conducted by studying and analyzing legal materials and related legal issues. Through international legal instruments as in Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), Article 6 paragraph (1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and in the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which are protocols additional to the ICCPR which obliges participating countries to ban the implementation of the death penalty and abolish the death penalty. However, the results of the study show that the application of the death penalty for Narcotics crimes must be carried out to protect the public by capital punishment for Narcotics offenders which does not conflict with human rights and international conventions of civil and political rights so that the death penalty can be applied in Indonesia.
死刑执行的国际法律视角——玛丽·简·菲斯塔·维罗索案研究
2010年4月25日,菲律宾公民玛丽·简(Mary Jane)因走私2.6公斤海洛因而在日惹的阿迪苏基多机场被警方逮捕。在本案中,最终于10月,Sleman地区法院以违反2009年第35号《麻醉品法》第114条第2款的罪名判处Marry Jane死刑。玛丽·简请求宽大处理,但被总统佐科威拒绝。Mary Jane随后试图提交司法审查(PK)和PK会议,其中Sleman地方法院决定将Mary PK转交给最高法院(MA)。由此产生了本文提出的主要问题,即国际法律审查如何应对几个国家,特别是印度尼西亚在毒品犯罪案件中仍然发生的死刑,以及对毒贩判处死刑的法律依据是什么。写这篇论文的目的是为了从人权和国际法的角度增加对死刑合法性的认识。本文采用研究分析法律资料和相关法律问题的研究方法。通过国际法律文书,如《世界人权宣言》第3条、《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第6条第1款和《公民权利和政治权利国际公约第二项任择议定书》,作为《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》的附加议定书,要求参与国禁止执行死刑并废除死刑。然而,研究结果表明,必须对毒品犯罪适用死刑,以保护公众,对毒品罪犯判处死刑,这与人权和国际公民权利和政治权利公约不相冲突,以便在印度尼西亚适用死刑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信