Internet Governance: The Role of Multistakeholder Organizations

Joe Waz, P. Weiser
{"title":"Internet Governance: The Role of Multistakeholder Organizations","authors":"Joe Waz, P. Weiser","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2195167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing international focus on the future of the ITU and its role (or lack thereof) in Internet governance, there is greater attention being paid to the fact that much of the 'governance' of the Internet is in fact carried out by so-called 'multistakeholder ('MSH') organizations.' Over the last two decades, these entities have largely established the norms and standards for the global Internet, but they are little known to the general public and even to most regulators and legislators. Indeed, most governments do not understand the essential role of MSH organizations. Consequently, to develop an effective Internet governance strategy, the origin, role, and operation of MSH organizations must be better understood, as must the limits of such organizations for 'governing' an ever more complex Internet ecosystem. This essay, which builds on a roundtable conference on this topic, addresses the rising importance of MSH organizations and sets forth the framework for a research agenda on the topic. Notably, it explains that, for them to become broadly accepted, a new wave of research is needed to better understand how MSH organizations engage in Internet governance, where they operate effectively, and where they fall short of the mark. It also discusses when MSH organization may, or may not, be the right tool for particular Internet policy challenges and how they can best work in conjunction with governmental bodies.","PeriodicalId":175866,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Political Processes","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Political Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2195167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

With the increasing international focus on the future of the ITU and its role (or lack thereof) in Internet governance, there is greater attention being paid to the fact that much of the 'governance' of the Internet is in fact carried out by so-called 'multistakeholder ('MSH') organizations.' Over the last two decades, these entities have largely established the norms and standards for the global Internet, but they are little known to the general public and even to most regulators and legislators. Indeed, most governments do not understand the essential role of MSH organizations. Consequently, to develop an effective Internet governance strategy, the origin, role, and operation of MSH organizations must be better understood, as must the limits of such organizations for 'governing' an ever more complex Internet ecosystem. This essay, which builds on a roundtable conference on this topic, addresses the rising importance of MSH organizations and sets forth the framework for a research agenda on the topic. Notably, it explains that, for them to become broadly accepted, a new wave of research is needed to better understand how MSH organizations engage in Internet governance, where they operate effectively, and where they fall short of the mark. It also discusses when MSH organization may, or may not, be the right tool for particular Internet policy challenges and how they can best work in conjunction with governmental bodies.
互联网治理:多利益相关方组织的角色
随着国际社会越来越关注国际电联的未来及其在互联网治理中的作用(或缺乏作用),人们越来越关注这样一个事实,即互联网的大部分“治理”实际上是由所谓的“多利益相关方”(MSH)组织实施的。在过去的二十年里,这些实体在很大程度上建立了全球互联网的规范和标准,但公众甚至大多数监管机构和立法者对它们知之甚少。事实上,大多数政府并不了解MSH组织的重要作用。因此,为了制定有效的互联网治理策略,必须更好地理解MSH组织的起源、角色和运作,以及这些组织在“治理”日益复杂的互联网生态系统方面的局限性。这篇文章建立在关于这个主题的圆桌会议的基础上,讨论了MSH组织日益增长的重要性,并提出了关于这个主题的研究议程的框架。值得注意的是,它解释说,为了使它们被广泛接受,需要进行新一轮的研究,以更好地了解MSH组织如何参与互联网治理,它们在哪些方面有效运作,以及在哪些方面存在不足。它还讨论了MSH组织何时可能或可能不是应对特定互联网政策挑战的正确工具,以及它们如何与政府机构最好地合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信