Russia in the Conceptual Designs of American Political Scientists

K. Kozlov
{"title":"Russia in the Conceptual Designs of American Political Scientists","authors":"K. Kozlov","doi":"10.18254/S207054760005973-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the modern approaches one of the most important American \"think tanks\" towards Russia, among them are the Heritage Foundation, the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations, that can be characterized as the adherents of the ideological conservative, liberal and centrist views respectively. While the Heritage Foundation and the Brookings Institution share traditional anti-Russian stereotypes, the Council on Foreign Relations shows more pragmatic and sensible assessment, based in many ways on the views of Richard N. Haass, its president. The article gives detailed examples of these “think tanks” opinions and recommendations while summary is presented in the brief analytical conclusion.","PeriodicalId":234634,"journal":{"name":"Russia and America in the 21st Century","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia and America in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/S207054760005973-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article reveals the modern approaches one of the most important American "think tanks" towards Russia, among them are the Heritage Foundation, the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations, that can be characterized as the adherents of the ideological conservative, liberal and centrist views respectively. While the Heritage Foundation and the Brookings Institution share traditional anti-Russian stereotypes, the Council on Foreign Relations shows more pragmatic and sensible assessment, based in many ways on the views of Richard N. Haass, its president. The article gives detailed examples of these “think tanks” opinions and recommendations while summary is presented in the brief analytical conclusion.
美国政治学家概念设计中的俄罗斯
文章揭示了美国最重要的“智库”之一——传统基金会、布鲁金斯学会和外交关系委员会——对俄罗斯的现代态度,这些智库可以分别被描述为意识形态上的保守派、自由派和中间派的拥护者。传统基金会(Heritage Foundation)和布鲁金斯学会(Brookings Institution)都有着传统的反俄刻板印象,而美国外交关系委员会(Council on Foreign Relations)则表现出更为务实和明智的评估,在很多方面都是基于其主席理查德·n·哈斯(Richard N. Haass)的观点。文章对这些“智库”的意见和建议给出了详细的例子,并在简要的分析结论中进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信