{"title":"Russia in the Conceptual Designs of American Political Scientists","authors":"K. Kozlov","doi":"10.18254/S207054760005973-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reveals the modern approaches one of the most important American \"think tanks\" towards Russia, among them are the Heritage Foundation, the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations, that can be characterized as the adherents of the ideological conservative, liberal and centrist views respectively. While the Heritage Foundation and the Brookings Institution share traditional anti-Russian stereotypes, the Council on Foreign Relations shows more pragmatic and sensible assessment, based in many ways on the views of Richard N. Haass, its president. The article gives detailed examples of these “think tanks” opinions and recommendations while summary is presented in the brief analytical conclusion.","PeriodicalId":234634,"journal":{"name":"Russia and America in the 21st Century","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia and America in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/S207054760005973-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The article reveals the modern approaches one of the most important American "think tanks" towards Russia, among them are the Heritage Foundation, the Brookings Institution and the Council on Foreign Relations, that can be characterized as the adherents of the ideological conservative, liberal and centrist views respectively. While the Heritage Foundation and the Brookings Institution share traditional anti-Russian stereotypes, the Council on Foreign Relations shows more pragmatic and sensible assessment, based in many ways on the views of Richard N. Haass, its president. The article gives detailed examples of these “think tanks” opinions and recommendations while summary is presented in the brief analytical conclusion.
文章揭示了美国最重要的“智库”之一——传统基金会、布鲁金斯学会和外交关系委员会——对俄罗斯的现代态度,这些智库可以分别被描述为意识形态上的保守派、自由派和中间派的拥护者。传统基金会(Heritage Foundation)和布鲁金斯学会(Brookings Institution)都有着传统的反俄刻板印象,而美国外交关系委员会(Council on Foreign Relations)则表现出更为务实和明智的评估,在很多方面都是基于其主席理查德·n·哈斯(Richard N. Haass)的观点。文章对这些“智库”的意见和建议给出了详细的例子,并在简要的分析结论中进行了总结。