An Empirical Study to Evaluate the Measurement of Leadership Management in Superior Islamic Higher Education

Athok Fu'adi
{"title":"An Empirical Study to Evaluate the Measurement of Leadership Management in Superior Islamic Higher Education","authors":"Athok Fu'adi","doi":"10.21154/cendekia.v21i1.6336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze and evaluate the determinants of the success of leadership management in superior Islamic higher education. The research sample collection method is non-probability sampling using purposive sampling. There were 422 respondents from six Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia. PLS-SEM analysis was used to test the structural model (8 variables and 41 constructs) and 17 hypotheses. The dimensions of the measurement model have met the evaluation of the measurement and structural model. The dominant factor measured leadership management. The job description was (IP5; λ = 89.00%), and the lowest factor was infrastructure facilities (PR4; λ = 77.30%). The ability of the structural model (R2) to explain the usefulness variable based on seven measuring variables was 79.50%. In contrast, the leadership management dimension (Q2) explains 59.40% of the phenomena predicted in the field. This research contributes to the success factor of measuring leadership management supported by the influence of worthiness, accuracy, and usefulness. The involvement of eight variables can facilitate the development and conceptualization of the leadership management model of Islamic higher education.","PeriodicalId":165060,"journal":{"name":"Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v21i1.6336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and evaluate the determinants of the success of leadership management in superior Islamic higher education. The research sample collection method is non-probability sampling using purposive sampling. There were 422 respondents from six Islamic higher education institutions in Indonesia. PLS-SEM analysis was used to test the structural model (8 variables and 41 constructs) and 17 hypotheses. The dimensions of the measurement model have met the evaluation of the measurement and structural model. The dominant factor measured leadership management. The job description was (IP5; λ = 89.00%), and the lowest factor was infrastructure facilities (PR4; λ = 77.30%). The ability of the structural model (R2) to explain the usefulness variable based on seven measuring variables was 79.50%. In contrast, the leadership management dimension (Q2) explains 59.40% of the phenomena predicted in the field. This research contributes to the success factor of measuring leadership management supported by the influence of worthiness, accuracy, and usefulness. The involvement of eight variables can facilitate the development and conceptualization of the leadership management model of Islamic higher education.
伊斯兰高等教育领导管理测评的实证研究
本研究旨在分析及评估伊斯兰高等教育中领导管理成功的决定因素。本研究样本采集方法为目的抽样的非概率抽样。共有422名受访者来自印度尼西亚的6所伊斯兰高等教育机构。采用PLS-SEM分析对结构模型(8个变量41个构式)和17个假设进行检验。测量模型的维度满足了测量和结构模型的评价。衡量领导管理的主要因素。职位描述为(IP5;λ = 89.00%),最低因子为基础设施(PR4;λ = 77.30%)。基于七个测量变量的结构模型(R2)解释有用性变量的能力为79.50%。相反,领导力管理维度(Q2)解释了该领域预测的59.40%的现象。本研究在价值性、准确性和有用性的影响下,为衡量领导管理的成功因素提供了支持。八个变量的参与可以促进伊斯兰高等教育领导管理模式的发展和概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信