How can remote sensing and GIS help in the verification of international treaties?

A. Abushady, A. Frank
{"title":"How can remote sensing and GIS help in the verification of international treaties?","authors":"A. Abushady, A. Frank","doi":"10.1109/RAST.2005.1512623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is designed to investigate how remote sensing and GIS can be used in the verification regime of International Treaties-It focuses on the semantic difference and transformation from the goals of a treaty to the observable and verifiable elements. A case study for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) is presented, demonstrating the potential capabilities for the use of Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing as a verification technology for the use on an On-Site Inspection (OSI) to narrow down the search area for an unknown underground event or a possible underground nuclear explosion. GIS, by spatially linking different layers of information, acts as a logical analytical tool to overview all the inputs for the verification. In simpler words, it adds up all the clues automatically in order to view the whole situation. For example, in the case of a CTBT verification regime, one has multiple data layers in the GIS database representing various technologies. One layer for the Seismic network and findings, another layer for the radionuclide measurements, and another for the visual observation findings. By overlaying all those layers together and by performing spatial querying in the GIS database, suspicious areas are denoted and identified, and hence an On-Site Inspection can be called to concentrate on those areas at first instead of the whole Inspection Area thus saving time and resources. It is clearly demonstrated that Satellite Imagery and GIS are useful tools and technologies in the verification regime for CTB treaty. However, it has to be understood that satellite imagery and GIS alone are insufficient, they have to be used together with all the other technologies stated in the treaty (e.g. seismic, radionuclide, etc.) and that they can not be the only technology used for the verification. Even though they are a powerful tool, they are strongly dependant on human operators and if the analyst makes a mistake in one of his approaches, the whole azimuth of the results shifts towards a wrong solution. Therefore, Satellite Imagery and GIS when integrated with other technologies acts as a strengthening tool to strengthen or weaken the assumptions but not as a litmus test giving a yes or no answer.","PeriodicalId":156704,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, 2005. RAST 2005.","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies, 2005. RAST 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAST.2005.1512623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is designed to investigate how remote sensing and GIS can be used in the verification regime of International Treaties-It focuses on the semantic difference and transformation from the goals of a treaty to the observable and verifiable elements. A case study for the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) is presented, demonstrating the potential capabilities for the use of Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing as a verification technology for the use on an On-Site Inspection (OSI) to narrow down the search area for an unknown underground event or a possible underground nuclear explosion. GIS, by spatially linking different layers of information, acts as a logical analytical tool to overview all the inputs for the verification. In simpler words, it adds up all the clues automatically in order to view the whole situation. For example, in the case of a CTBT verification regime, one has multiple data layers in the GIS database representing various technologies. One layer for the Seismic network and findings, another layer for the radionuclide measurements, and another for the visual observation findings. By overlaying all those layers together and by performing spatial querying in the GIS database, suspicious areas are denoted and identified, and hence an On-Site Inspection can be called to concentrate on those areas at first instead of the whole Inspection Area thus saving time and resources. It is clearly demonstrated that Satellite Imagery and GIS are useful tools and technologies in the verification regime for CTB treaty. However, it has to be understood that satellite imagery and GIS alone are insufficient, they have to be used together with all the other technologies stated in the treaty (e.g. seismic, radionuclide, etc.) and that they can not be the only technology used for the verification. Even though they are a powerful tool, they are strongly dependant on human operators and if the analyst makes a mistake in one of his approaches, the whole azimuth of the results shifts towards a wrong solution. Therefore, Satellite Imagery and GIS when integrated with other technologies acts as a strengthening tool to strengthen or weaken the assumptions but not as a litmus test giving a yes or no answer.
遥感和地理信息系统如何帮助核查国际条约?
本研究旨在探讨如何在国际条约的核查制度中使用遥感和地理信息系统——它侧重于从条约目标到可观察和可核查元素的语义差异和转换。介绍了《全面禁止核试验条约》(CTBT)的一个案例研究,展示了使用卫星图像和遥感作为现场视察(OSI)核查技术的潜在能力,以缩小未知地下事件或可能的地下核爆炸的搜索区域。地理信息系统通过在空间上连接不同层次的信息,作为一种逻辑分析工具来概述所有输入的验证。简而言之,它会自动将所有线索加起来,以便查看整个情况。例如,在CTBT核查制度的情况下,GIS数据库中有多个数据层,表示各种技术。一层用于地震台网和结果,另一层用于放射性核素测量,另一层用于目视观测结果。通过将所有这些层叠加在一起,并在GIS数据库中执行空间查询,可以标记和识别可疑区域,从而可以调用现场检查,首先集中在这些区域,而不是整个检查区域,从而节省时间和资源。这清楚地表明,卫星图像和地理信息系统是CTB条约核查制度中的有用工具和技术。但是,必须理解,仅靠卫星图像和地理信息系统是不够的,它们必须与条约中规定的所有其他技术(例如地震、放射性核素等)一起使用,而且它们不能是用于核查的唯一技术。尽管它们是一个强大的工具,但它们强烈依赖于人工操作,如果分析师在其中一种方法中犯了错误,那么整个结果的方向就会转向错误的解决方案。因此,卫星图像和地理信息系统与其他技术相结合时,可作为加强或削弱假设的工具,而不是作为给出是或否答案的试金石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信