‘Not all socialists dress the same’: Menswear as cultural capital in China

Anthony Lawrence Bednall
{"title":"‘Not all socialists dress the same’: Menswear as cultural capital in China","authors":"Anthony Lawrence Bednall","doi":"10.1386/csmf_00040_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chinese sartorial style, like many cultures, has been defined, formalized and articulated to its population by hierarchical definition and visual association. Menswear styles have transitioned from strict Imperial codes, to westernized adoption, designed to shape a new modernism, as\n various leadership regimes imposed and defined dress codes to implement political and cultural structures. Sustainable practices were developed through the design and construction methods of Imperial garments and as a response to low resources, famine and inefficient management systems during\n the early years of the People’s Republic of China. This period was characterized by rationing for fabrics, recycling and the re-invention of existing garments. Through a contemporary lens, this can be viewed as an integrated sustainable approach to the mass clothing of a significantly\n sized population. However, intervening regimes including the post-Imperial Nationalist leadership and the post-Mao Communist leadership cultivated a new visual identity for the Chinese population as westernization became the prefix for modernization. This article aims to map the historical\n development of menswear as cultural capital in China, to contextualize sustainable practices in the production of garments and define how these practices were systematically and repeatedly rejected in favour of new consumerism. It also aims to historically define the role of menswear in China\n as a representation of the nation’s outward-facing international image and ambitions as a serious and contemporary player, within the global political and cultural community.","PeriodicalId":165644,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies in Men???s Fashion","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies in Men???s Fashion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/csmf_00040_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chinese sartorial style, like many cultures, has been defined, formalized and articulated to its population by hierarchical definition and visual association. Menswear styles have transitioned from strict Imperial codes, to westernized adoption, designed to shape a new modernism, as various leadership regimes imposed and defined dress codes to implement political and cultural structures. Sustainable practices were developed through the design and construction methods of Imperial garments and as a response to low resources, famine and inefficient management systems during the early years of the People’s Republic of China. This period was characterized by rationing for fabrics, recycling and the re-invention of existing garments. Through a contemporary lens, this can be viewed as an integrated sustainable approach to the mass clothing of a significantly sized population. However, intervening regimes including the post-Imperial Nationalist leadership and the post-Mao Communist leadership cultivated a new visual identity for the Chinese population as westernization became the prefix for modernization. This article aims to map the historical development of menswear as cultural capital in China, to contextualize sustainable practices in the production of garments and define how these practices were systematically and repeatedly rejected in favour of new consumerism. It also aims to historically define the role of menswear in China as a representation of the nation’s outward-facing international image and ambitions as a serious and contemporary player, within the global political and cultural community.
“并非所有社会主义者都穿得一样”:男装是中国的文化资本
像许多文化一样,中国的服装风格已经通过等级定义和视觉联想被定义、形式化并与它的人民联系起来。男装风格已经从严格的帝国规范过渡到西方化的采用,旨在塑造一种新的现代主义,因为各种领导政权强加和定义了着装规范,以实施政治和文化结构。可持续发展的做法是通过设计和建造皇家服装的方法,并作为对中华人民共和国早期资源匮乏、饥荒和低效管理制度的回应。这一时期的特点是织物配给,回收和现有服装的再发明。从当代的角度来看,这可以被视为一种综合的可持续方法,以满足大量人口的大众服装。然而,随着西方化成为现代化的前缀,包括后帝国国民党领导层和后毛共产党领导层在内的干预政权为中国人培养了一种新的视觉身份。本文旨在描绘男装作为中国文化资本的历史发展,将服装生产中的可持续实践置于背景下,并定义这些实践如何被系统地反复拒绝,以支持新消费主义。它还旨在从历史上定义中国男装的角色,作为中国对外国际形象的代表,以及作为全球政治和文化社区中一个严肃和当代参与者的雄心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信