The Development of Self and Peer Assessment Instruments for the Meat Processing Practicum

Gea Azoya Apriarani, M. Handayani, D. Azizah
{"title":"The Development of Self and Peer Assessment Instruments for the Meat Processing Practicum","authors":"Gea Azoya Apriarani, M. Handayani, D. Azizah","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210203.092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to know the validity of the developed self and peer assessment instrument for meat processing practicum and to know the instrument results in assessing students discipline on meat processing practicum. The method used in this study is the method of development and validation with planning, development, validation testing, and testing as the stages. This study was conducted at a meat processing practicum with 48 students as participants and 5 observers. All of the data used in this study, in the form of selfassessment scores, peer assessment, and observer assessment, were analyzed by looking at their similarities. The developed instrument has been declared valid by the experts. The results of the use indicate that there are 17 students with very good discipline, 8 students with good discipline, and 6 students with enough discipline. The validity is not only adapting the literature related to this instrument, but has been declared valid by experts (expert judgment), and can be used based on the results of the trial analysis. The more similarities of scores obtained indicate that the developed instrument can not only be used but also good enough for assessing student discipline in the meat processing","PeriodicalId":392776,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 6th UPI International Conference on TVET 2020 (TVET 2020)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 6th UPI International Conference on TVET 2020 (TVET 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210203.092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to know the validity of the developed self and peer assessment instrument for meat processing practicum and to know the instrument results in assessing students discipline on meat processing practicum. The method used in this study is the method of development and validation with planning, development, validation testing, and testing as the stages. This study was conducted at a meat processing practicum with 48 students as participants and 5 observers. All of the data used in this study, in the form of selfassessment scores, peer assessment, and observer assessment, were analyzed by looking at their similarities. The developed instrument has been declared valid by the experts. The results of the use indicate that there are 17 students with very good discipline, 8 students with good discipline, and 6 students with enough discipline. The validity is not only adapting the literature related to this instrument, but has been declared valid by experts (expert judgment), and can be used based on the results of the trial analysis. The more similarities of scores obtained indicate that the developed instrument can not only be used but also good enough for assessing student discipline in the meat processing
肉类加工实习自我与同行评估工具的开发
本研究旨在了解已开发之肉品加工实习自我及同伴评量工具之效度,并了解该工具在肉品加工实习学生纪律评量结果。本研究采用的方法是以计划、开发、验证测试、测试为阶段的开发验证方法。本研究在肉类加工实习中进行,有48名学生作为参与者和5名观察员。本研究中使用的所有数据,以自我评估分数、同伴评估和观察者评估的形式,通过观察它们的相似性来分析。所研制的仪器经专家宣布有效。使用结果显示:纪律良好的学生17人,纪律良好的学生8人,纪律较好的学生6人。效度不仅适用于与该仪器相关的文献,而且已被专家宣布有效(专家判断),并可根据试验分析的结果使用。所得到的分数相似度较高,表明所开发的仪器不仅可以用于评估学生在肉类加工中的纪律,而且足够好
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信