Book Review: A greener vision of home: cultural politics and environmental reform in the German Heimatschutz movement, 1904-1918

D. Matless
{"title":"Book Review: A greener vision of home: cultural politics and environmental reform in the German Heimatschutz movement, 1904-1918","authors":"D. Matless","doi":"10.1177/096746080000700406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In A greener vision of home William Rollins provides a history of the German Heimatschutz movement, focusing on its linked environmental and cultural philosophies. Rollins offers a story of a predominantly middle-class movement responding to ‘the need for a culturally active brand of environmentalism, one that gave people something positive to aim for – a greener vision of home’ (p. viii) – and which in the process produced the term Heimat as a cultural force in its own right and a ‘paradigm of value’ (p. 5). The book appears in a series on ‘Social history, popular culture and politics in Germany’, but its implications as a telling study of ‘environmental culture’ (p. 6) go beyond German history. The book is divided into four substantive chapters, an introduction and conclusion. In the introduction Rollins highlights the complex relationship of modernity and nostalgia in such a movement, warning against the tendency to dismiss it as a simplistic reaction against the modern world. The first chapter provides a context for the movement, stressing German historical antecedents such as early nineteenth-century movements for land beautification, and parallels with movements in Britain. Chapter 2 focuses on the emergence of the Heimatschutz in Wilhelmine society, showing how it turned a term previously used in relation to military defence to environmental ends. Formally inaugurated in Dresden in March 1904 and initially focused in central Germany, by 1908 the movement had a strong influence on planning and architectural policies. A breakdown of the 30 000 membership in 1914 shows a predominance of civil servants, educationalists and businessmen. Rollins, employing a Gramscian analysis of hegemonic and counterhegemonic culture, terms this, slightly awkwardly, a counterculture within the bourgeoisie, negotiating rights of property and community and criticizing the acts of capitalist ‘native vandals’ (p. 148) through ‘Heimat economics’ (p. 144). In Chapter 3 Rollins covers specific strategies for ‘Envisioning the Heimat landscape’, highlighting a range of concerns which echo movements elsewhere; the erection of billboards in the landscape, field rationalization, forest monoculture. Debates over river-straightening could come straight from contemporary dis-","PeriodicalId":104830,"journal":{"name":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecumene (continues as Cultural Geographies)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/096746080000700406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In A greener vision of home William Rollins provides a history of the German Heimatschutz movement, focusing on its linked environmental and cultural philosophies. Rollins offers a story of a predominantly middle-class movement responding to ‘the need for a culturally active brand of environmentalism, one that gave people something positive to aim for – a greener vision of home’ (p. viii) – and which in the process produced the term Heimat as a cultural force in its own right and a ‘paradigm of value’ (p. 5). The book appears in a series on ‘Social history, popular culture and politics in Germany’, but its implications as a telling study of ‘environmental culture’ (p. 6) go beyond German history. The book is divided into four substantive chapters, an introduction and conclusion. In the introduction Rollins highlights the complex relationship of modernity and nostalgia in such a movement, warning against the tendency to dismiss it as a simplistic reaction against the modern world. The first chapter provides a context for the movement, stressing German historical antecedents such as early nineteenth-century movements for land beautification, and parallels with movements in Britain. Chapter 2 focuses on the emergence of the Heimatschutz in Wilhelmine society, showing how it turned a term previously used in relation to military defence to environmental ends. Formally inaugurated in Dresden in March 1904 and initially focused in central Germany, by 1908 the movement had a strong influence on planning and architectural policies. A breakdown of the 30 000 membership in 1914 shows a predominance of civil servants, educationalists and businessmen. Rollins, employing a Gramscian analysis of hegemonic and counterhegemonic culture, terms this, slightly awkwardly, a counterculture within the bourgeoisie, negotiating rights of property and community and criticizing the acts of capitalist ‘native vandals’ (p. 148) through ‘Heimat economics’ (p. 144). In Chapter 3 Rollins covers specific strategies for ‘Envisioning the Heimat landscape’, highlighting a range of concerns which echo movements elsewhere; the erection of billboards in the landscape, field rationalization, forest monoculture. Debates over river-straightening could come straight from contemporary dis-
书评:绿色家园:德国Heimatschutz运动中的文化政治和环境改革,1904-1918
在《绿色家园》一书中,威廉·罗林斯介绍了德国Heimatschutz运动的历史,重点关注其与环境和文化哲学的联系。罗林斯提供了一个以中产阶级为主的运动的故事,它回应了“对文化上活跃的环保主义品牌的需求,这种需求给了人们积极的目标——一个更绿色的家园”(第8页),并在这个过程中产生了Heimat这个词,作为一种自己的文化力量和一种“价值范式”(第5页)。这本书出现在“德国的社会历史、流行文化和政治”系列中。但是,作为对“环境文化”的生动研究(第6页),它的含义超越了德国历史。全书分为四个实质性的章节,绪论和结语。在引言中,罗林斯强调了这种运动中现代性和怀旧的复杂关系,并警告人们不要将其视为对现代世界的简单反应。第一章提供了运动的背景,强调德国的历史先例,如19世纪早期的土地美化运动,以及与英国运动的相似之处。第二章着重于威廉社会中海马茨舒茨的出现,展示了它如何将以前用于军事防御的术语转变为环境目的。1904年3月在德累斯顿正式成立,最初集中在德国中部,到1908年,该运动对规划和建筑政策产生了强烈的影响。1914年对3万名会员的统计显示,公务员、教育家和商人占主导地位。罗林斯运用葛兰西对霸权和反霸权文化的分析,稍微有些笨拙地将其称为资产阶级内部的反主流文化,通过“海马特经济学”(第144页)来谈判财产和社区的权利,并批评资本主义“本土破坏者”的行为(第148页)。在第3章中,罗林斯涵盖了“设想海玛特景观”的具体策略,强调了一系列与其他地方运动相呼应的关注;在景观中架设广告牌,使田野合理化,森林单一化。关于河流整治的争论可能直接来自于当代的争议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信