The use of virtual telephone clinic in elective foot and ankle follow up

H. Ahmed, K. Teoh
{"title":"The use of virtual telephone clinic in elective foot and ankle follow up","authors":"H. Ahmed, K. Teoh","doi":"10.37515/ortho.8231.3104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Virtual clinics have been shown to be safe and cost-effective in many specialties. Many articles have been found in the literature about its usefulness in fracture occasions, but we have not found many discussing its effectiveness in foot and ankle elective cases follow ups. The aim of this audit is to show its safety, clinical outcomes, and complications. Patients and methods: In Princess Alexandra Hospital, UK, we collected data from COSMICS system which contained patient contact details, PACS and case note management system were used to see previous investigations and dictation letters and to check the outcome of the virtual clinic. Results: 292 patients were included, from them 167 were females (57.8%), while 125 were males (42.8%).148 patients were contacted by mobile phones (50.7%), 41 patients (14%) were contacted by landline, and unfortunately 67 patients (22.9%) have not picked the phone. From the 292 patients, 232 (79.5%) patients were dischargedone patient requested to be seen face to face. 40 patients (14%) were listed for being reviewed and 12 patients were listed for surgery (4.1%). 8 patients were listed for having PRP/local anesthetic/ steroid injection. Conclusion: Virtual telephone clinics for elective foot and ankle cases are very effective way for management of busy clinics with long waiting lists provided that it was run safely. We reported from our study the rules by which we run it and many benefits and drawbacks were also highlighted with our recommendations to maximize the gain from it.","PeriodicalId":252930,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Orthopaedic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37515/ortho.8231.3104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual clinics have been shown to be safe and cost-effective in many specialties. Many articles have been found in the literature about its usefulness in fracture occasions, but we have not found many discussing its effectiveness in foot and ankle elective cases follow ups. The aim of this audit is to show its safety, clinical outcomes, and complications. Patients and methods: In Princess Alexandra Hospital, UK, we collected data from COSMICS system which contained patient contact details, PACS and case note management system were used to see previous investigations and dictation letters and to check the outcome of the virtual clinic. Results: 292 patients were included, from them 167 were females (57.8%), while 125 were males (42.8%).148 patients were contacted by mobile phones (50.7%), 41 patients (14%) were contacted by landline, and unfortunately 67 patients (22.9%) have not picked the phone. From the 292 patients, 232 (79.5%) patients were dischargedone patient requested to be seen face to face. 40 patients (14%) were listed for being reviewed and 12 patients were listed for surgery (4.1%). 8 patients were listed for having PRP/local anesthetic/ steroid injection. Conclusion: Virtual telephone clinics for elective foot and ankle cases are very effective way for management of busy clinics with long waiting lists provided that it was run safely. We reported from our study the rules by which we run it and many benefits and drawbacks were also highlighted with our recommendations to maximize the gain from it.
虚拟电话门诊在选择性足踝随访中的应用
介绍:虚拟诊所已被证明是安全的和具有成本效益的许多专科。文献中有许多文章讨论了其在骨折中的作用,但我们没有发现很多文章讨论其在足部和踝关节选择性病例随访中的有效性。审核的目的是显示其安全性、临床结果和并发症。患者和方法:在英国亚历山德拉公主医院,我们从COSMICS系统收集数据,其中包含患者的联系方式,PACS和病例记录管理系统用于查看以前的调查和听写信件,并检查虚拟诊所的结果。结果:纳入292例患者,其中女性167例(占57.8%),男性125例(占42.8%)。148例患者通过手机联系(50.7%),41例患者通过座机联系(14%),不幸的是67例患者(22.9%)没有选择电话。292例患者中,232例(79.5%)出院,要求面诊。40例患者(14%)被列入复查名单,12例患者被列入手术名单(4.1%)。8例患者行PRP/局麻/类固醇注射。结论:在安全运行的前提下,虚拟电话门诊是一种非常有效的管理门诊候诊人数众多的方法。我们从我们的研究中报告了我们运行它的规则,并强调了许多优点和缺点,以及我们的建议,以最大限度地利用它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信