Bank Classification Algorithm: Case Study of Ghanaian Banks

Peter Appiahene, Y. Missah
{"title":"Bank Classification Algorithm: Case Study of Ghanaian Banks","authors":"Peter Appiahene, Y. Missah","doi":"10.1109/ICCSPN46366.2019.9150171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of banks performance with respect to their efficiency is normally done using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. Determining the performance of a bank by using only its overall efficiency without taking into consideration the efficiency at the deposit stage (stage 1) and efficiency at the investment stage (stage 2) can provide misrepresentation results and unfair assessments. Literature on using a two-stage DEA model to measure and classifying the banks using data from Ghana is also scarce. The purpose is to evaluate the efficiency of bank using DEA model and also classify the bank branches into classes using a proposed Bank Classification Algorithm (BC Algorithm). The study adopted a two-stage DEA model to measure the efficiency scores of 444 Ghanaian bank branches. The efficiencies of the banks in collecting deposits as well as investing the deposit were all calculates using the CCR Two-Phase DEA BuildHull algorithm. This algorithm has its package “Robust Data Envelopment Analysis” (rDEA) version 1.2-5 was implemented in R using R studio. The proposed Bank Classification Algorithm (BC Algorithm) was used to classify the banks where efficient bank was designated as bank with efficiency score of 80% or more. For deposit stage, 72.5%of the Banks were in class 2 thus, majority of the banks even though were not efficient in using resources to collect deposit, they were able to achieve overall efficiency. Just about 10.6% of the banks were efficient in collecting deposit from customers and also achieve overall efficiency. For investment stage, 82.9% of the banks were class 2 thus, majority was not efficient deposit (stage 2) but they were able to achieve overall efficiency. Just about 16.7% (74) of the banks were not efficient in investing their deposit and also achieve overall efficiency. Finally, the results of the analysis show that majority of DMUs thus commercial bank branches in Ghana achieve greater percentage (80% or more) of performance/ overall efficiency in their dual role operations. Further work could be carried out by applying a different model or even combining machine learning algorithms such as Decision Tree, Random Forest or Neural Network with the DEA to predict the efficiency scores on these selected banks.","PeriodicalId":177460,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing and Networks (ICCSPN)","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing and Networks (ICCSPN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSPN46366.2019.9150171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of banks performance with respect to their efficiency is normally done using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. Determining the performance of a bank by using only its overall efficiency without taking into consideration the efficiency at the deposit stage (stage 1) and efficiency at the investment stage (stage 2) can provide misrepresentation results and unfair assessments. Literature on using a two-stage DEA model to measure and classifying the banks using data from Ghana is also scarce. The purpose is to evaluate the efficiency of bank using DEA model and also classify the bank branches into classes using a proposed Bank Classification Algorithm (BC Algorithm). The study adopted a two-stage DEA model to measure the efficiency scores of 444 Ghanaian bank branches. The efficiencies of the banks in collecting deposits as well as investing the deposit were all calculates using the CCR Two-Phase DEA BuildHull algorithm. This algorithm has its package “Robust Data Envelopment Analysis” (rDEA) version 1.2-5 was implemented in R using R studio. The proposed Bank Classification Algorithm (BC Algorithm) was used to classify the banks where efficient bank was designated as bank with efficiency score of 80% or more. For deposit stage, 72.5%of the Banks were in class 2 thus, majority of the banks even though were not efficient in using resources to collect deposit, they were able to achieve overall efficiency. Just about 10.6% of the banks were efficient in collecting deposit from customers and also achieve overall efficiency. For investment stage, 82.9% of the banks were class 2 thus, majority was not efficient deposit (stage 2) but they were able to achieve overall efficiency. Just about 16.7% (74) of the banks were not efficient in investing their deposit and also achieve overall efficiency. Finally, the results of the analysis show that majority of DMUs thus commercial bank branches in Ghana achieve greater percentage (80% or more) of performance/ overall efficiency in their dual role operations. Further work could be carried out by applying a different model or even combining machine learning algorithms such as Decision Tree, Random Forest or Neural Network with the DEA to predict the efficiency scores on these selected banks.
银行分类算法:以加纳银行为例
银行绩效的效率评价通常采用数据包络分析(DEA)模型。仅以整体效率来确定银行绩效,而不考虑存款阶段(第一阶段)和投资阶段(第二阶段)的效率,可能会产生错误的结果和不公平的评估。关于使用两阶段DEA模型使用加纳的数据来衡量和分类银行的文献也很少。目的是使用DEA模型来评估银行的效率,并使用提出的银行分类算法(BC算法)对银行分支机构进行分类。本研究采用两阶段DEA模型对加纳444家银行分支机构的效率得分进行测度。银行在吸收存款和投资存款方面的效率都是使用CCR两阶段DEA BuildHull算法计算的。该算法有其软件包“鲁棒数据包络分析”(rDEA)版本1.2-5,使用R studio在R中实现。采用本文提出的银行分类算法(BC算法)对效率得分在80%及以上的银行进行分类。在存款阶段,72.5%的银行属于二类,因此,大多数银行即使在利用资源吸收存款方面效率不高,但它们能够实现整体效率。只有约10.6%的银行能够有效地向客户收取存款,并达到整体效率。在投资阶段,82.9%的银行是2类,因此,大多数不是有效存款(阶段2),但他们能够实现整体效率。只有约16.7%(74家)的银行在存款投资方面没有效率,也没有达到整体效率。最后,分析结果表明,加纳的大多数dmu因此商业银行分支机构在其双重角色运营中实现了更高的绩效/整体效率百分比(80%或更多)。进一步的工作可以通过应用不同的模型,甚至将机器学习算法(如决策树、随机森林或神经网络)与DEA结合起来,来预测这些选定银行的效率得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信