Dokumentace a prezentace venkovského stavitelství v ČR: historický vývoj a současné možnosti a limity

Jiří Woitsch, Kateřina Sedlická, Dana Motyčková
{"title":"Dokumentace a prezentace venkovského stavitelství v ČR: historický vývoj a současné možnosti a limity","authors":"Jiří Woitsch, Kateřina Sedlická, Dana Motyčková","doi":"10.37520/cnm.2021.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Documentation and presentation of vernacular architecture in the Czech Republic: Historical overview and possibilities and limits of contemporary approaches\n\nThe study presents an analysis of the basic trends in the documentation and presentation of vernacular (peasant, rural) architecture in the Czech Republic over the past 150 years. Based on this analysis, four basic stages of documentation of vernacular architecture were identified. They differ primarily in the institutional background and the degree of professionalisation of the activities carried out, the theoretical-methodological and epistemological conceptualisation of rural architecture in the fields of art history on the one hand and ethnology on the other, the degree of systematicity and spatial complexity of research and documentation, and finally its objectives (documentation carried out solely for the purpose of scientific research vs. documentation aimed also at popularisation and presentation of results to the public). The developmental stages of documentation and presentation of vernacular architecture are: (a) Stage of haphazard lay and expert documentation with presentation objectives (2nd half of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century); (b) Stage of haphazard mainly expert/scientific documentation without presentation objectives (beginning of the 20th century to the 1950s). (c) Stage of systematic professional/ scientific documentation without presentation objectives (1950s to 1990s); (d) Stage of haphazard and systematic professional/scientific documentation with presentation objectives and use of new technological possibilities (1990s to present). Using the specific example of the VISKALIA project (Virtual Open Air Museum), the article also points out the possibilities and limits of contemporary documentation and presentation of rural architecture offered to ethnology and ethnology-oriented museology and related fields by contemporary trends in the so-called digital humanities and heritage science.","PeriodicalId":440569,"journal":{"name":"Časopis Národního muzea. Řada historická","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Časopis Národního muzea. Řada historická","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37520/cnm.2021.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Documentation and presentation of vernacular architecture in the Czech Republic: Historical overview and possibilities and limits of contemporary approaches The study presents an analysis of the basic trends in the documentation and presentation of vernacular (peasant, rural) architecture in the Czech Republic over the past 150 years. Based on this analysis, four basic stages of documentation of vernacular architecture were identified. They differ primarily in the institutional background and the degree of professionalisation of the activities carried out, the theoretical-methodological and epistemological conceptualisation of rural architecture in the fields of art history on the one hand and ethnology on the other, the degree of systematicity and spatial complexity of research and documentation, and finally its objectives (documentation carried out solely for the purpose of scientific research vs. documentation aimed also at popularisation and presentation of results to the public). The developmental stages of documentation and presentation of vernacular architecture are: (a) Stage of haphazard lay and expert documentation with presentation objectives (2nd half of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century); (b) Stage of haphazard mainly expert/scientific documentation without presentation objectives (beginning of the 20th century to the 1950s). (c) Stage of systematic professional/ scientific documentation without presentation objectives (1950s to 1990s); (d) Stage of haphazard and systematic professional/scientific documentation with presentation objectives and use of new technological possibilities (1990s to present). Using the specific example of the VISKALIA project (Virtual Open Air Museum), the article also points out the possibilities and limits of contemporary documentation and presentation of rural architecture offered to ethnology and ethnology-oriented museology and related fields by contemporary trends in the so-called digital humanities and heritage science.
捷克共和国乡土建筑的文献和展示:历史概述、当代方法的可能性和局限性本研究分析了过去150年来捷克共和国乡土建筑(农民、农村)文献和展示的基本趋势。在此基础上,确定了乡土建筑文献记录的四个基本阶段。它们的主要区别在于制度背景和所开展活动的专业化程度,一方面是艺术史领域的乡村建筑的理论方法和认识论概念化,另一方面是民族学,研究和文献的系统性和空间复杂性的程度,最后是其目标(仅为科学研究目的而进行的文件与也旨在普及和向公众展示结果的文件)。乡土建筑文献和展示的发展阶段是:(a)以展示为目的的随意的专业文献和专家文献阶段(19世纪下半叶至20世纪初);(b)没有提出目标的主要是专家/科学文件的偶然阶段(20世纪初至50年代)。(c)没有提出目标的系统的专业/科学文件阶段(1950年代至1990年代);(d)偶然和系统的专业/科学文件阶段,目的是介绍和利用新技术的可能性(1990年代至今)。本文还以VISKALIA项目(虚拟露天博物馆)为例,指出了当代数字人文和遗产科学趋势为民族学和以民族学为导向的博物馆学及相关领域提供当代乡村建筑文献和呈现的可能性和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信