Discourse Analysis of the Arguments Developed in Model Rocketry Learning Environment

Cem Gürel, H. Olgun, Erol Süzük, Zeynep Gürel
{"title":"Discourse Analysis of the Arguments Developed in Model Rocketry Learning Environment","authors":"Cem Gürel, H. Olgun, Erol Süzük, Zeynep Gürel","doi":"10.15345/IOJES.2014.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article History: Received 10.06.2013 Received in revised form 24.01.2014 Accepted 28.01.2014 Available online 21.04.2014 The aim of this study was via discursive interactions to investigate solution patterns of prospective teachers when they face some ill-structured problems. In an authentic environment, model rocketry motion was applied. As a data collection tool, two open ended qualitative questions related with model rocketry in two conditions were used. In the first condition air friction was neglected and in the second one it was considered. Prospective teachers’ answers were tabulated and then redistributed to them in order to make them discuss with each other. Argumentation activities were carried out in this way and all the activities were video and audio recorded by two cameras. Discourse analysis of the collected data was performed in three steps, reading/classifying, interpretation and construction, to probe the intensity of dialogic and authoritative discourse in a university science class. It was concluded that prospective teachers were found they were developing solutions in an environment of social interaction. Prospective teachers tended to use a scientific language both when they were criticized or questioned and when they were asking questions about their and other prospective teachers’ ideas for the solution of an ill structured problem. As a conclusion, argumentation activities performed in authentic environments within learning communities which are in social interaction will help to find solutions for ill structured problems used for teaching physics. Clubs on model rocketry should be supported in schools to develop learning communities. © 2014 IOJES. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":358961,"journal":{"name":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Online Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15345/IOJES.2014.01.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Article History: Received 10.06.2013 Received in revised form 24.01.2014 Accepted 28.01.2014 Available online 21.04.2014 The aim of this study was via discursive interactions to investigate solution patterns of prospective teachers when they face some ill-structured problems. In an authentic environment, model rocketry motion was applied. As a data collection tool, two open ended qualitative questions related with model rocketry in two conditions were used. In the first condition air friction was neglected and in the second one it was considered. Prospective teachers’ answers were tabulated and then redistributed to them in order to make them discuss with each other. Argumentation activities were carried out in this way and all the activities were video and audio recorded by two cameras. Discourse analysis of the collected data was performed in three steps, reading/classifying, interpretation and construction, to probe the intensity of dialogic and authoritative discourse in a university science class. It was concluded that prospective teachers were found they were developing solutions in an environment of social interaction. Prospective teachers tended to use a scientific language both when they were criticized or questioned and when they were asking questions about their and other prospective teachers’ ideas for the solution of an ill structured problem. As a conclusion, argumentation activities performed in authentic environments within learning communities which are in social interaction will help to find solutions for ill structured problems used for teaching physics. Clubs on model rocketry should be supported in schools to develop learning communities. © 2014 IOJES. All rights reserved
模型火箭学学习环境下论证的话语分析
文章历史:2013年6月10日收到修改稿24.01.2014接受28.01.2014在线发布21.04.2014本研究的目的是通过语篇互动来调查未来教师面对一些结构不良问题时的解决方式。在真实环境中,应用了模型火箭运动。作为数据收集工具,在两种情况下使用了两个与模型火箭相关的开放式定性问题。在第一种情况下忽略空气摩擦,在第二种情况下考虑空气摩擦。未来教师的答案被制成表格,然后重新分发给他们,以便他们相互讨论。辩论赛活动就是这样进行的,所有的辩论赛活动都用两台摄像机进行了录像和录音。对收集到的数据进行语篇分析,分为阅读/分类、解释和构建三个步骤,以探讨大学科学课中对话和权威语篇的强度。结论是,未来的教师发现他们正在社会互动的环境中发展解决方案。未来的教师倾向于使用科学的语言,无论是当他们被批评或质疑时,还是当他们询问他们和其他未来教师对解决一个结构不良的问题的想法时。综上所述,在社会互动的学习社区的真实环境中进行的论证活动将有助于找到解决物理教学中结构不良问题的方法。应在学校支持火箭模型俱乐部,以发展学习型社区。©2014 iojes。版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信