Practice makes better: quiz retake software to increase student learning

Kesina Baral, A. Offutt, P. Ammann, Rasika Mohod
{"title":"Practice makes better: quiz retake software to increase student learning","authors":"Kesina Baral, A. Offutt, P. Ammann, Rasika Mohod","doi":"10.1145/3472673.3473965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past few years, we have made several pedagogical changes to the way we teach and assess student knowledge in our courses.These courses are undergraduate software engineering courses taken in the third or fourth years, and graduate (non-research) courses taken as part of a master’s degree. They are taken by software engineering majors and computer science majors. This paper focuses on a specific technique–allowing students to retake weekly quizzes.We use weekly quizzes to offer more frequent, yet lower stakes,assessments than the traditional midterm exam. Quizzes are usually given at the beginning of class meetings. We offer students who under-performed or who missed a quiz the chance to try again. A major contribution of this paper is a description of scheduling soft-ware we developed to facilitate the retake process. Retake quizzes are different from the original quizzes, but cover the same material and are of similar difficulty. Our goal is to improve student learning and retention. This paper presents a post-hoc retrospective analysis of student performance on retake quizzes. In such a scenario, only limited conclusions can be drawn. Nonetheless, we see encouraging signs that students not only achieve higher overall scores when retaking quizzes, but that some students perform better on the final exam.","PeriodicalId":155474,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Education through Advanced Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Education through Advanced Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3472673.3473965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the past few years, we have made several pedagogical changes to the way we teach and assess student knowledge in our courses.These courses are undergraduate software engineering courses taken in the third or fourth years, and graduate (non-research) courses taken as part of a master’s degree. They are taken by software engineering majors and computer science majors. This paper focuses on a specific technique–allowing students to retake weekly quizzes.We use weekly quizzes to offer more frequent, yet lower stakes,assessments than the traditional midterm exam. Quizzes are usually given at the beginning of class meetings. We offer students who under-performed or who missed a quiz the chance to try again. A major contribution of this paper is a description of scheduling soft-ware we developed to facilitate the retake process. Retake quizzes are different from the original quizzes, but cover the same material and are of similar difficulty. Our goal is to improve student learning and retention. This paper presents a post-hoc retrospective analysis of student performance on retake quizzes. In such a scenario, only limited conclusions can be drawn. Nonetheless, we see encouraging signs that students not only achieve higher overall scores when retaking quizzes, but that some students perform better on the final exam.
熟能生巧:重考软件可以增加学生的学习
在过去的几年里,我们对课程中教授和评估学生知识的方式进行了几次教学改革。这些课程是第三或第四年的本科软件工程课程,以及研究生(非研究)课程,作为硕士学位的一部分。软件工程专业和计算机科学专业的学生都参加了这些考试。本文的重点是一种特殊的技术——允许学生重新参加每周的测验。与传统的期中考试相比,我们使用每周小测验来提供更频繁、但风险更低的评估。小测验通常在班会开始时进行。我们为表现不佳或错过测验的学生提供再试一次的机会。本文的一个主要贡献是描述了我们开发的调度软件,以促进重拍过程。复考测验与原来的测验不同,但涵盖的内容相同,难度相似。我们的目标是提高学生的学习和记忆力。这篇论文提出了一个事后的回顾性分析学生的表现在重考测验。在这种情况下,只能得出有限的结论。尽管如此,我们看到了令人鼓舞的迹象,学生们不仅在补考时取得了更高的总分,而且一些学生在期末考试中表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信