72 Jam Pertama Pendekatan Komunikasi Risiko Untuk Kesiapsiagaan Bencana

Al-MUNZIR Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.31332/am.v16i2.4045
Fajar Setyaning Dwi Putra
{"title":"72 Jam Pertama Pendekatan Komunikasi Risiko Untuk Kesiapsiagaan Bencana","authors":"Fajar Setyaning Dwi Putra","doi":"10.31332/am.v16i2.4045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disasters are caused by the interaction of biophysical systems, human systems, and the built environment. Disaster management with a lack of understanding and context of risk communication. When a major disaster occurs, recovery requires a massive infusion of external public and private resources, but what happens is that conditions are highly unequal, and likely to produce many of the pre-existing inequities in exposure and vulnerability. This research focuses on the first 72 hours of disaster relief through effective communication in the case of the 13 June 2022 tornado in Yogyakarta. The purpose of this study is to provide education about the first 72 hours that must be carried out in handling disaster cases through an effective and central communication channel. The research method used is qualitative, existential phenomenology and the paradigm built is constructivism. The findings in the field show that the people of Yogyakarta still lack knowledge about how to communicate effectively in dealing with disasters such as a lack of evacuation training, minimal communication tools, minimal evacuation route maps, even in the context of a tornado disaster, no residents know what to do. to do and to whom they should communicate first. The potential impact of ineffective communication; more and more victims, disaster losses increased partly because the way to design and build communication is wrong and not on target. Many people speculate about the causes of disasters, the minimal contribution of society to increased exposure to hazards often results in damage to environmental resources such as the collapse of people's houses and damage to public facilities. Initial disaster failure; identifying communication lines to ensure evacuation of highly vulnerable environments should be known before disaster. Improvement of long-term communication lines needs to be improved by mapping community communication patterns, communication tools and who is the first person to contact.Keywords: Risk Communication, Disaster Communication, Disaster Evacuation, Communication Lines","PeriodicalId":413082,"journal":{"name":"Al-MUNZIR","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-MUNZIR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31332/am.v16i2.4045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disasters are caused by the interaction of biophysical systems, human systems, and the built environment. Disaster management with a lack of understanding and context of risk communication. When a major disaster occurs, recovery requires a massive infusion of external public and private resources, but what happens is that conditions are highly unequal, and likely to produce many of the pre-existing inequities in exposure and vulnerability. This research focuses on the first 72 hours of disaster relief through effective communication in the case of the 13 June 2022 tornado in Yogyakarta. The purpose of this study is to provide education about the first 72 hours that must be carried out in handling disaster cases through an effective and central communication channel. The research method used is qualitative, existential phenomenology and the paradigm built is constructivism. The findings in the field show that the people of Yogyakarta still lack knowledge about how to communicate effectively in dealing with disasters such as a lack of evacuation training, minimal communication tools, minimal evacuation route maps, even in the context of a tornado disaster, no residents know what to do. to do and to whom they should communicate first. The potential impact of ineffective communication; more and more victims, disaster losses increased partly because the way to design and build communication is wrong and not on target. Many people speculate about the causes of disasters, the minimal contribution of society to increased exposure to hazards often results in damage to environmental resources such as the collapse of people's houses and damage to public facilities. Initial disaster failure; identifying communication lines to ensure evacuation of highly vulnerable environments should be known before disaster. Improvement of long-term communication lines needs to be improved by mapping community communication patterns, communication tools and who is the first person to contact.Keywords: Risk Communication, Disaster Communication, Disaster Evacuation, Communication Lines
灾害是由生物物理系统、人类系统和建筑环境的相互作用造成的。灾害管理缺乏对风险沟通的理解和背景。当重大灾难发生时,恢复需要大量外部公共和私人资源的注入,但实际情况是,条件非常不平等,可能会产生许多先前存在的风险和脆弱性方面的不平等。本研究的重点是在2022年6月13日日惹龙卷风的情况下,通过有效的沟通进行救灾的头72小时。这项研究的目的是提供教育,让人们了解在通过有效的中央通讯渠道处理灾害案件时必须在最初的72小时内进行的工作。研究方法为质性、存在现象学,构建的范式为建构主义。实地调查结果表明,日惹居民仍然缺乏如何有效沟通以应对灾害的知识,例如缺乏疏散培训,沟通工具很少,疏散路线图很少,即使在龙卷风灾害的情况下,居民也不知道该怎么做。做什么,应该先和谁沟通。无效沟通的潜在影响;越来越多的受害者,灾难损失的增加部分是因为设计和建立沟通的方式是错误的,没有达到目标。许多人猜测灾害的原因,社会对增加暴露于危险的最小贡献往往导致环境资源的破坏,如人们房屋的倒塌和公共设施的破坏。初始灾难失效;确定通信线路,确保在灾难发生前疏散高度脆弱的环境。长期通信线路的改进需要通过绘制社区通信模式、通信工具和谁是第一个接触的人来改进。关键词:风险沟通,灾害沟通,灾害疏散,通信线路
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信