Commodity Index Traders and the Boom/Bust Cycle in Commodities Prices

David N. Frenk, Wallace C. Turbeville
{"title":"Commodity Index Traders and the Boom/Bust Cycle in Commodities Prices","authors":"David N. Frenk, Wallace C. Turbeville","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1945570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2005, the public has lived with high and volatile prices for basic energy and agricultural commodities. The public focus on this unprecedented commodity price volatility has been intense, because a large proportion of the cost of living borne by individuals and families in the U.S. (and around the globe) is represented by commodities-based costs, notably food, fuel, and clothing. Interestingly, as commodity prices have shown more price volatility, there has been an accompanying significant increase in the volume of commodities futures and swaps transactions, as well as commodities markets open interest. Moreover, Commodity Index Traders ('CITs'), a relatively new type of participant, now collectively make up the single largest group of non-commercial participants in commodities futures markets. These CITs, which represent giant institutional pools of capital, have at times been the single largest class of participant, outweighing bona fide hedgers (producers and consumers of commodities) and traditional “speculators,” who take short-term bi-directional bets and provide liquidity. Given both the size and the specific and largely homogeneous investment strategy of the CITs, many market observers have concluded that this group is most likely responsible for greatly disrupting price formation in commodities futures markets. Further, it has been posited that this distortion has directly led to recent unprecedented price volatility and higher absolute price levels for numerous food and energy commodities in markets around the world. Using a new set of analytic approaches, the authors seek to test whether the behavior of CITs has impacted commodities prices in a manner independent of fundamental supply and demand forces. Specifically, we examine the behavior of futures price spreads before, during, and after the monthly CIT 'Roll' period, a set period from the 5th to 9th business day of each month, during which funds tracking the most popular commodity index, the Standard & Poor’s Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI) must roll forward their expiring futures contracts. We find strong evidence that the CIT Roll Cycle systematically distorts forward commodities futures price curves towards a contango state, which is likely to contribute to speculative 'boom/bust' cycles by changing the incentives of producers and consumers of storable commodities, and also by sending misleading and non-fundamental, price signals to the market.","PeriodicalId":403142,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Agriculture","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1945570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Since 2005, the public has lived with high and volatile prices for basic energy and agricultural commodities. The public focus on this unprecedented commodity price volatility has been intense, because a large proportion of the cost of living borne by individuals and families in the U.S. (and around the globe) is represented by commodities-based costs, notably food, fuel, and clothing. Interestingly, as commodity prices have shown more price volatility, there has been an accompanying significant increase in the volume of commodities futures and swaps transactions, as well as commodities markets open interest. Moreover, Commodity Index Traders ('CITs'), a relatively new type of participant, now collectively make up the single largest group of non-commercial participants in commodities futures markets. These CITs, which represent giant institutional pools of capital, have at times been the single largest class of participant, outweighing bona fide hedgers (producers and consumers of commodities) and traditional “speculators,” who take short-term bi-directional bets and provide liquidity. Given both the size and the specific and largely homogeneous investment strategy of the CITs, many market observers have concluded that this group is most likely responsible for greatly disrupting price formation in commodities futures markets. Further, it has been posited that this distortion has directly led to recent unprecedented price volatility and higher absolute price levels for numerous food and energy commodities in markets around the world. Using a new set of analytic approaches, the authors seek to test whether the behavior of CITs has impacted commodities prices in a manner independent of fundamental supply and demand forces. Specifically, we examine the behavior of futures price spreads before, during, and after the monthly CIT 'Roll' period, a set period from the 5th to 9th business day of each month, during which funds tracking the most popular commodity index, the Standard & Poor’s Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI) must roll forward their expiring futures contracts. We find strong evidence that the CIT Roll Cycle systematically distorts forward commodities futures price curves towards a contango state, which is likely to contribute to speculative 'boom/bust' cycles by changing the incentives of producers and consumers of storable commodities, and also by sending misleading and non-fundamental, price signals to the market.
商品指数交易者和商品价格的盛衰周期
自2005年以来,公众一直生活在基本能源和农产品价格的高企和波动之中。公众对这种前所未有的大宗商品价格波动的关注一直很强烈,因为美国(以及全球)个人和家庭承担的生活成本中有很大一部分是基于大宗商品的成本,尤其是食品、燃料和服装。有趣的是,随着大宗商品价格表现出更大的波动性,大宗商品期货和掉期交易量以及大宗商品市场的未平仓合约也随之大幅增加。此外,商品指数交易员(CITs)是一种相对较新的参与者类型,现在共同构成了商品期货市场非商业参与者的最大单一群体。这些cit代表着巨大的机构资本池,有时是最大的参与者类别,超过了真正的对冲者(商品生产者和消费者)和传统的"投机者",后者进行短期双向押注并提供流动性。考虑到cit的规模和具体且基本同质化的投资策略,许多市场观察人士得出结论,这一群体很可能要对大宗商品期货市场价格形成的巨大扰乱负责。此外,有人认为,这种扭曲直接导致了世界各地市场上许多粮食和能源商品最近前所未有的价格波动和更高的绝对价格水平。使用一套新的分析方法,作者试图测试cit的行为是否以一种独立于基本供需力量的方式影响了商品价格。具体来说,我们研究了每月CIT滚动期之前、期间和之后的期货价差行为。滚动期是每月第5至9个工作日的一段时间,在此期间,追踪最受欢迎的商品指数,即标准普尔高盛商品指数(GSCI)的基金必须滚动其到期的期货合约。我们发现强有力的证据表明,CIT滚动周期系统性地扭曲了商品期货价格曲线走向期货溢价状态,这可能会通过改变可储存商品的生产者和消费者的激励机制,以及向市场发送误导性和非基本的价格信号,从而导致投机性的“繁荣/萧条”周期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信