Network analysis software for diagramming arguments in informal logic classes

Abstract

This article addresses the use of Network Analysis Software to diagram arguments in Informal Logic classes. It is shown as an innovative possibility that goes beyond the classic work with pencil and paper and even the work with specific software dedicated to diagramming. In particular, diagrams made in pencil and paper and diagrams elaborated with Araucaria software are compared through the construction of network graphs obtained by juxtaposing individual diagrams made by the students. The results show that there are no significant differences in the indices compared and that the verified variations respond to differences in the representation systems. Finally, the study suggests that the Network Analysis Software inaugurates a new form of diagrammatic cartographies with interest for the teaching of Logic.