Profile of Antimicrobial Resistance and Sensitivity in Vulvar Abscesses in Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital

Mello Anelise Gomes de, Pereira Cintia Caus, Motta Fernanda Chagas Reuter, Souza Paloma Vieira de, Arrigoni Carolina Passos, C. Antônio
{"title":"Profile of Antimicrobial Resistance and Sensitivity in Vulvar Abscesses in Women Attending a Tertiary Hospital","authors":"Mello Anelise Gomes de, Pereira Cintia Caus, Motta Fernanda Chagas Reuter, Souza Paloma Vieira de, Arrigoni Carolina Passos, C. Antônio","doi":"10.33425/2639-9342.1200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Vulvar abscess is a highly prevalent pathology in patients seeking emergency care; however, its epidemiology has yet to be fully clarified. Aims: This study aimed to determine possible risk factors, the most common microorganisms involved and the appropriate antibiotic therapy in cases of vulvar abscesses treated in a tertiary hospital. Settings and Design: This prospective study included 51 women who presented with a vulvar abscess and sought medical help at the hospital’s gynaecological emergency room over a 70-week period. Methods: Drainage of the abscess and microbiological analysis allowed the pathogen responsible for the lesion to be identified, as well as the profile of antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance to be determined. Statistical analysis: Frequencies and percentages, as well as means, medians and standard deviations, were calculated. Associations between the study variables were determined using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Overall, 52.94% of the cultures were positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There was no significant difference in age between the patients infected with MRSA and those infected with other agents (p>0.05). The MRSA isolates were sensitive to sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim and to gentamicin, as were the great majority of the other pathogens. Shaving the vulvar region was the most important risk factor, being present in 74.5% of cases. Conclusion: MRSA is highly prevalent and a major cause of vulvar abscesses. Therefore, in these cases, an antibiotic therapy regimen with coverage for MRSA, such as sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, should be initiated as soon as possible.","PeriodicalId":147903,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology & Reproductive Health","volume":"226 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9342.1200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Vulvar abscess is a highly prevalent pathology in patients seeking emergency care; however, its epidemiology has yet to be fully clarified. Aims: This study aimed to determine possible risk factors, the most common microorganisms involved and the appropriate antibiotic therapy in cases of vulvar abscesses treated in a tertiary hospital. Settings and Design: This prospective study included 51 women who presented with a vulvar abscess and sought medical help at the hospital’s gynaecological emergency room over a 70-week period. Methods: Drainage of the abscess and microbiological analysis allowed the pathogen responsible for the lesion to be identified, as well as the profile of antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance to be determined. Statistical analysis: Frequencies and percentages, as well as means, medians and standard deviations, were calculated. Associations between the study variables were determined using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: Overall, 52.94% of the cultures were positive for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). There was no significant difference in age between the patients infected with MRSA and those infected with other agents (p>0.05). The MRSA isolates were sensitive to sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim and to gentamicin, as were the great majority of the other pathogens. Shaving the vulvar region was the most important risk factor, being present in 74.5% of cases. Conclusion: MRSA is highly prevalent and a major cause of vulvar abscesses. Therefore, in these cases, an antibiotic therapy regimen with coverage for MRSA, such as sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, should be initiated as soon as possible.
某三级医院女性外阴脓肿患者抗菌药物耐药性及敏感性分析
背景:外阴脓肿是寻求紧急护理的患者中非常普遍的病理;然而,其流行病学尚未得到充分澄清。目的:本研究旨在确定在三级医院治疗的外阴脓肿病例中可能的危险因素、最常见的微生物和适当的抗生素治疗。背景和设计:这项前瞻性研究包括51名在70周内出现外阴脓肿并在医院妇科急诊室寻求医疗帮助的妇女。方法:通过脓肿引流及微生物学分析,确定引起脓肿的病原菌,并确定抗菌药物的敏感性和耐药性。统计分析:计算频率和百分比,以及平均值、中位数和标准差。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验确定研究变量之间的关联。结果:总体而言,52.94%的培养物耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)阳性。MRSA感染患者与其他药物感染患者的年龄差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。与绝大多数其他病原体一样,MRSA分离株对磺胺甲恶唑+甲氧苄啶和庆大霉素敏感。外阴区域剃须是最重要的危险因素,占74.5%。结论:MRSA发病率高,是外阴脓肿的主要原因。因此,在这些病例中,应尽快开始覆盖MRSA的抗生素治疗方案,如磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信