Comparative Study of the Traditional, Arctan and Robust Droop Control Techniques in an Islanded Micro-grid

M. A. Ineza, Michael Juma Saulo, C. Wekesa, Jean de Dieu Iyakaremye, Dalson Athanase Gace
{"title":"Comparative Study of the Traditional, Arctan and Robust Droop Control Techniques in an Islanded Micro-grid","authors":"M. A. Ineza, Michael Juma Saulo, C. Wekesa, Jean de Dieu Iyakaremye, Dalson Athanase Gace","doi":"10.1109/PowerAfrica53997.2022.9905322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The micro-grid can operate either in grid-connected or islanded mode. An islanded mode operation needs a controller to ensure voltage and frequency stability and proper power-sharing amongst distributed generation (DG) units. Droop controller has recently gained popularity among the other techniques because it does not require a communication path and is relatively inexpensive. Therefore, this paper aims to offer a comparative study of three droop control techniques, namely, the traditional droop control (TDC), arctan droop control (ADC), and robust droop control (RDC). This is accomplished by assessing each technique’s capabilities in providing accurate load power-sharing amongst DG units while also providing better voltage and frequency regulation. Utilizing MATLAB/SIMULINK software, a simple micro-grid made of two parallel-connected inverters with resistive-inductive load is used to compare the performance of these three methods. Results showed that the ADC technique provides the best frequency regulation relative to the RDC and TDC techniques. In contrast, the RDC technique gives the best voltage regulation compared to the ADC and TDC techniques. Furthermore, the RDC strategy presented lower errors compare to the ADC and TDC strategies when DG units supply the loads regarding the real and reactive power-sharing errors.","PeriodicalId":371237,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PowerAfrica53997.2022.9905322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The micro-grid can operate either in grid-connected or islanded mode. An islanded mode operation needs a controller to ensure voltage and frequency stability and proper power-sharing amongst distributed generation (DG) units. Droop controller has recently gained popularity among the other techniques because it does not require a communication path and is relatively inexpensive. Therefore, this paper aims to offer a comparative study of three droop control techniques, namely, the traditional droop control (TDC), arctan droop control (ADC), and robust droop control (RDC). This is accomplished by assessing each technique’s capabilities in providing accurate load power-sharing amongst DG units while also providing better voltage and frequency regulation. Utilizing MATLAB/SIMULINK software, a simple micro-grid made of two parallel-connected inverters with resistive-inductive load is used to compare the performance of these three methods. Results showed that the ADC technique provides the best frequency regulation relative to the RDC and TDC techniques. In contrast, the RDC technique gives the best voltage regulation compared to the ADC and TDC techniques. Furthermore, the RDC strategy presented lower errors compare to the ADC and TDC strategies when DG units supply the loads regarding the real and reactive power-sharing errors.
孤岛微电网传统、Arctan和鲁棒下垂控制技术的比较研究
微电网可以并网运行,也可以孤岛运行。孤岛模式运行需要一个控制器来确保电压和频率的稳定性以及分布式发电(DG)机组之间的适当功率共享。下垂控制器最近在其他技术中获得了普及,因为它不需要通信路径并且相对便宜。因此,本文旨在对传统下垂控制(TDC)、arctan下垂控制(ADC)和鲁棒下垂控制(RDC)三种下垂控制技术进行比较研究。这是通过评估每种技术在DG单元之间提供准确负载功率共享的能力来实现的,同时还提供更好的电压和频率调节。利用MATLAB/SIMULINK软件,以具有阻感性负载的两个逆变器并联组成的简单微电网为例,比较了这三种方法的性能。结果表明,相对于RDC和TDC技术,ADC技术提供了最好的频率调节。相比之下,与ADC和TDC技术相比,RDC技术提供了最好的电压调节。此外,当DG机组供电时,RDC策略与ADC和TDC策略相比,在实功率和无功功率共享误差方面具有更低的误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书