An Eminent and Erudite Platonist

A. Taylor
{"title":"An Eminent and Erudite Platonist","authors":"A. Taylor","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190246365.003.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A. E. Taylor argued at length against an artificial dichotomy between fact and value, in an effort to carve out evidential space for morality. Divorcing facts and values is like trying to separate the sounds of a great symphony from its musical quality. More important than what we do is who we are, and what’s needed is an adequate account for the sort of external assistance we desperately require to be radically transformed (even transfigured)—after all, Taylor said, we can’t pull ourselves up by our own hair—so we can enjoy a good never left behind and never superseded. The inherent features of moral guilt point in the direction of a personal and perfectly loving God as our first and final cause. Taylor counseled close and sustained attentiveness to the moral evidence and (as we’ve seen in others) modeled a laudably expansive epistemology.","PeriodicalId":161709,"journal":{"name":"The Moral Argument","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Moral Argument","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190246365.003.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A. E. Taylor argued at length against an artificial dichotomy between fact and value, in an effort to carve out evidential space for morality. Divorcing facts and values is like trying to separate the sounds of a great symphony from its musical quality. More important than what we do is who we are, and what’s needed is an adequate account for the sort of external assistance we desperately require to be radically transformed (even transfigured)—after all, Taylor said, we can’t pull ourselves up by our own hair—so we can enjoy a good never left behind and never superseded. The inherent features of moral guilt point in the direction of a personal and perfectly loving God as our first and final cause. Taylor counseled close and sustained attentiveness to the moral evidence and (as we’ve seen in others) modeled a laudably expansive epistemology.
一位杰出而博学的柏拉图主义者
a·e·泰勒(A. E. Taylor)在努力为道德开辟证据空间的过程中,详尽地论证了事实与价值之间人为的二分法。把事实和价值观分开,就像试图把一首伟大交响乐的声音和它的音乐品质分开。比我们做什么更重要的是我们是谁,我们所需要的是对我们迫切需要的那种外部援助的充分解释,以便从根本上改变(甚至改变形象)——毕竟,泰勒说,我们不能靠自己的头发把自己拉起来——这样我们才能享受一种永远不会被遗忘、永远不会被取代的美好。道德罪的内在特征指出,一个个人的、完全慈爱的神是我们最初和最终的原因。泰勒建议密切持续关注道德证据,并(正如我们在其他人身上看到的)建立了一个值得称赞的扩展认识论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信