The Relationship Between the Reporting of Environmental Capital Expenditure in the 10-K Reports and Online Sustainability Reporting of U.S. Largest Energy and Utilities Companies

Elgeritte Adidjaja, J. E. Morhardt
{"title":"The Relationship Between the Reporting of Environmental Capital Expenditure in the 10-K Reports and Online Sustainability Reporting of U.S. Largest Energy and Utilities Companies","authors":"Elgeritte Adidjaja, J. E. Morhardt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1605329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a study of the 45 largest U.S. energy and utilities companies demonstrating a correlation between the inclusion by these companies of data on environmental capital expenditures (ECE) in their 2008 10-K annual financial reports and the score that the companies attain on the Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) - a rating system developed by the Roberts Environmental Center at Claremont McKenna College of the same year. ECE is defined as capitalized environmental costs that are made voluntarily or by government mandate to prevent future environmental contamination, while the PSI is a scoring system measuring the breadth and depth of companies’ online sustainability reporting (CSR). Neither the reporting of ECE in the 10-K reports nor CSR is currently regulated, resulting in a wide variation in companies’ sustainability disclosures. ECE reporters achieve higher PSI scores. A higher ratio of ECE to total capital expenditures or to assets predicts a higher level of PSI scores.","PeriodicalId":371292,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Social Responsibility & Public Policy (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Social Responsibility & Public Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1605329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper is a study of the 45 largest U.S. energy and utilities companies demonstrating a correlation between the inclusion by these companies of data on environmental capital expenditures (ECE) in their 2008 10-K annual financial reports and the score that the companies attain on the Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) - a rating system developed by the Roberts Environmental Center at Claremont McKenna College of the same year. ECE is defined as capitalized environmental costs that are made voluntarily or by government mandate to prevent future environmental contamination, while the PSI is a scoring system measuring the breadth and depth of companies’ online sustainability reporting (CSR). Neither the reporting of ECE in the 10-K reports nor CSR is currently regulated, resulting in a wide variation in companies’ sustainability disclosures. ECE reporters achieve higher PSI scores. A higher ratio of ECE to total capital expenditures or to assets predicts a higher level of PSI scores.
美国最大的能源和公用事业公司10-K报告中环境资本支出报告与在线可持续发展报告之间的关系
本文对美国45家最大的能源和公用事业公司进行了研究,展示了这些公司在2008年10-K年度财务报告中纳入的环境资本支出(ECE)数据与公司在太平洋可持续发展指数(PSI)上获得的分数之间的相关性。PSI是克莱蒙特麦肯纳学院罗伯茨环境中心同年开发的评级系统。ECE被定义为自愿或政府授权的资本化环境成本,以防止未来的环境污染,而PSI是衡量公司在线可持续发展报告(CSR)的广度和深度的评分系统。目前,在10-K报告和企业社会责任中都没有对欧洲经委会的报告进行监管,导致公司可持续性披露的差异很大。欧洲经委会记者获得更高的PSI分数。欧洲经委会与总资本支出或资产的比率越高,预示着PSI得分水平越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信