Initiation of Antenatal Care, Content of Care Received and Determinants for Early Visit -An Opportunity Still Missed in Pakistan

{"title":"Initiation of Antenatal Care, Content of Care Received and Determinants for Early Visit -An Opportunity Still Missed in Pakistan","authors":"","doi":"10.37184/lnjpc.2707-3521.4.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND:\nAntenatal care coverage increased tremendously in the last two decades in developing countries, with at least half of women having 4 or more visits to a clinic. But this rise in utilization did not translate into substantially lower maternal and neonatal mortality rates.\nOBJECTIVE: To determine the time of initiating antenatal care and assess the effect of time of initiation of antenatal care (ANC) on the content of care received and factors associated with the time of initiating care.\nMETHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted from September 2020 to December 2020. The study population included all women who delivered at the hospital. The time of the first antenatal visit and content of care received by the woman was assessed. The primary outcome variable was the time of the first antenatal visit. Secondary measures included the content of care received by women. \nRESULTS: Of the 1388 women included, only 160 (11.5%) had their first visit before 14 weeks of pregnancy. When stratified according to time of visit, blood pressure measurement (p=0.021), weight measurement (p= 0.011), urine testing (p=0.015) and iron and folic acid supplementation (p=0.013) were significantly greater for women who started care within three months. Women who were older (p˂0.001) and had delivered before (p=0.001) were more likely to access antenatal care earlier. Similarly, women with some education (p ˂0.001) and higher monthly income (p=0.003) started visits sooner than those who were uneducated and had lesser income. On the multivariable model, lower age, being nulliparous, no formal education and lower income were determinants of late booking.\nCONCLUSION: The prevalence of early initiation of antenatal care was very low. The content of care received by women who presented early was also significantly different from those who presented late. Older age, previous birth; education and monthly income were determinants of early antenatal care visits. Awareness programs for early initiation of antenatal care need to be implemented.","PeriodicalId":140679,"journal":{"name":"Liaquat National Journal of Primary Care","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liaquat National Journal of Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37184/lnjpc.2707-3521.4.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antenatal care coverage increased tremendously in the last two decades in developing countries, with at least half of women having 4 or more visits to a clinic. But this rise in utilization did not translate into substantially lower maternal and neonatal mortality rates. OBJECTIVE: To determine the time of initiating antenatal care and assess the effect of time of initiation of antenatal care (ANC) on the content of care received and factors associated with the time of initiating care. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted from September 2020 to December 2020. The study population included all women who delivered at the hospital. The time of the first antenatal visit and content of care received by the woman was assessed. The primary outcome variable was the time of the first antenatal visit. Secondary measures included the content of care received by women. RESULTS: Of the 1388 women included, only 160 (11.5%) had their first visit before 14 weeks of pregnancy. When stratified according to time of visit, blood pressure measurement (p=0.021), weight measurement (p= 0.011), urine testing (p=0.015) and iron and folic acid supplementation (p=0.013) were significantly greater for women who started care within three months. Women who were older (p˂0.001) and had delivered before (p=0.001) were more likely to access antenatal care earlier. Similarly, women with some education (p ˂0.001) and higher monthly income (p=0.003) started visits sooner than those who were uneducated and had lesser income. On the multivariable model, lower age, being nulliparous, no formal education and lower income were determinants of late booking. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of early initiation of antenatal care was very low. The content of care received by women who presented early was also significantly different from those who presented late. Older age, previous birth; education and monthly income were determinants of early antenatal care visits. Awareness programs for early initiation of antenatal care need to be implemented.
产前保健的启动,所接受的护理内容和早期就诊的决定因素-巴基斯坦仍然错过的机会
背景:在过去二十年中,发展中国家的产前保健覆盖率大大增加,至少有一半的妇女到诊所就诊四次或以上。但是,这种使用率的增加并没有转化为产妇和新生儿死亡率的大幅降低。目的:确定产前保健开始时间,评价产前保健开始时间(ANC)对所接受护理内容及开始护理时间相关因素的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性横断面研究,于2020年9月至2020年12月进行。研究人群包括所有在医院分娩的妇女。评估了该妇女第一次产前检查的时间和所接受护理的内容。主要结局变量是第一次产前检查的时间。次要措施包括妇女接受护理的内容。结果:在纳入的1388名妇女中,只有160名(11.5%)在怀孕14周之前进行了第一次就诊。当根据就诊时间分层时,血压测量(p=0.021)、体重测量(p= 0.011)、尿液测试(p=0.015)以及铁和叶酸补充(p=0.013)在三个月内开始治疗的妇女中显著增加。年龄较大(p小于0.001)和以前分娩过(p=0.001)的妇女更有可能更早获得产前护理。同样,受过一定教育(p小于0.001)和月收入较高(p=0.003)的女性比未受过教育和收入较低的女性更早开始访问。在多变量模型中,年龄较低、未婚、未受过正规教育和收入较低是延迟预订的决定因素。结论:早期开展产前保健的比例很低。早到的妇女所接受的护理内容与晚到的妇女也有显著差异。年龄较大,以前出生;教育程度和月收入是早期产前检查的决定因素。需要实施早期开展产前保健的宣传规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信