Sixty-Day Pudendal Nerve Stimulation: A Potential Therapy for Refractory Pudendal Neuralgia Case Report

Shalini Shah
{"title":"Sixty-Day Pudendal Nerve Stimulation: A Potential Therapy for Refractory Pudendal Neuralgia Case Report","authors":"Shalini Shah","doi":"10.36076/pmcr.2021.5.393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Pudendal neuralgia (PN) can cause severe, disabling chronic pain. Though common, PN is frequently unrecognized and misdiagnosed. Historically, the last-resort treatment for PN has been permanent implantation of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), but SCS for PN carries high risk of complications and explantation. We report the first case of temporary (60-day) peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment for refractory PN. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old woman presented with one year of chronic bilateral suprapubic vaginal pain radiating to the bilateral proximal medial thighs with concomitant dysuria, urinary frequency, and pain with intercourse. PN was confirmed via diagnostic pudendal nerve block. Using fluoroscopic guidance, we implanted PNS leads on the left and, subsequently, the right pudendal nerves, with explantation at 60 days for each lead. The patient reported continuing pain reduction with 80% improvement in the Visual Analog Scale score at 6 months, resumption of normal activity and functionality, discontinued use of opioids, and high satisfaction with treatment. This case is notable for the sustained pain relief provided by this temporary and minimally invasive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that 60-day PNS with fluoroscopic guidance is a viable treatment for refractory PN in correctly selected patients. This treatment is low-risk, minimally invasive, and may be used early in the care continuum, potentially sparing patients multiple failed treatments and the risks associated with permanently implanted devices. KEY WORDS: Pudendal nerve, peripheral nerve stimulation, neuromodulation, chronic pain, pelvic pain, perineal pain, case report","PeriodicalId":122753,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine Case Reports","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36076/pmcr.2021.5.393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pudendal neuralgia (PN) can cause severe, disabling chronic pain. Though common, PN is frequently unrecognized and misdiagnosed. Historically, the last-resort treatment for PN has been permanent implantation of spinal cord stimulation (SCS), but SCS for PN carries high risk of complications and explantation. We report the first case of temporary (60-day) peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment for refractory PN. CASE REPORT: A 63-year-old woman presented with one year of chronic bilateral suprapubic vaginal pain radiating to the bilateral proximal medial thighs with concomitant dysuria, urinary frequency, and pain with intercourse. PN was confirmed via diagnostic pudendal nerve block. Using fluoroscopic guidance, we implanted PNS leads on the left and, subsequently, the right pudendal nerves, with explantation at 60 days for each lead. The patient reported continuing pain reduction with 80% improvement in the Visual Analog Scale score at 6 months, resumption of normal activity and functionality, discontinued use of opioids, and high satisfaction with treatment. This case is notable for the sustained pain relief provided by this temporary and minimally invasive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that 60-day PNS with fluoroscopic guidance is a viable treatment for refractory PN in correctly selected patients. This treatment is low-risk, minimally invasive, and may be used early in the care continuum, potentially sparing patients multiple failed treatments and the risks associated with permanently implanted devices. KEY WORDS: Pudendal nerve, peripheral nerve stimulation, neuromodulation, chronic pain, pelvic pain, perineal pain, case report
60天阴部神经刺激:难治性阴部神经痛的一种潜在治疗方法
背景:阴部神经痛(PN)可引起严重的、致残的慢性疼痛。虽然常见,但PN经常被忽视和误诊。从历史上看,治疗PN的最后手段是永久性植入脊髓刺激(SCS),但SCS治疗PN有很高的并发症和外植的风险。我们报告第一例临时(60天)外周神经刺激(PNS)治疗难治性PN。病例报告:一名63岁女性表现为一年的慢性双侧耻骨上阴道疼痛,并放射至双侧大腿内侧近端,同时伴有排尿困难、尿频和性交疼痛。通过外阴神经阻滞确诊PN。在透视引导下,我们将PNS导联植入左侧阴部神经,随后植入右侧阴部神经,每根导联在60天后取出。患者报告疼痛持续减轻,6个月时视觉模拟量表评分改善80%,恢复正常活动和功能,停止使用阿片类药物,治疗满意度高。这个病例值得注意的是,这种暂时的微创治疗提供了持续的疼痛缓解。结论:本病例提示,在正确选择难治性PN患者的情况下,在透视引导下进行60天PNS治疗是可行的。这种治疗是低风险、微创性的,可以在护理连续性的早期使用,可能使患者避免多次治疗失败和永久植入装置相关的风险。关键词:阴部神经,周围神经刺激,神经调节,慢性疼痛,盆腔疼痛,会阴疼痛,病例报告
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信