How followers’ emotional stability and cultural value orientations moderate the impact of health-promoting leadership and abusive supervision on health-related resources

Anita Bregenzer, J. Felfe, Sabine Bergner, P. Jiménez
{"title":"How followers’ emotional stability and cultural value orientations moderate the impact of health-promoting leadership and abusive supervision on health-related resources","authors":"Anita Bregenzer, J. Felfe, Sabine Bergner, P. Jiménez","doi":"10.1177/2397002218823300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health-related resources at work are crucial for followers to stay healthy and to cope with job demands. This study investigates the impact of health-promoting leadership as well as abusive supervision on followers’ social and task resources as antecedents of their health. Moreover, it examines whether the impact of leadership on followers’ health-related resources depends on the followers’ emotional stability and cultural value orientations (i.e. power distance and collectivism). A total of 503 employees from Austria, Germany and Slovenia took part in this online study and provided information on their leaders’ health-promoting behaviour and abusive supervision as well as on their own emotional stability, perceived power distance and collectivism. The results of a hierarchical regression analysis strongly support the importance of simultaneously assessing health-promoting leadership and abusive supervision when predicting task and social resources. Abusive supervision added incremental variance above health-promoting leadership when followers’ task resources were predicted. Moreover, the results suggest that followers benefit from or suffer differently under perceived leadership: high power distance enhances the positive effect of health-promoting leadership on followers’ social resources, while collectivism strengthens the negative impact of abusive supervision on followers’ social resources. Finally, emotionally stable followers who are working with highly abusive leaders experience a stronger threat to their resources compared to emotionally stable followers who are working with less abusive leaders. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of how leaders impact those resources known to influence followers’ health. They further show that follower personality and cultural value orientations determine the impact of leadership behaviour on health-related resources.","PeriodicalId":206271,"journal":{"name":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","volume":"509 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002218823300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Health-related resources at work are crucial for followers to stay healthy and to cope with job demands. This study investigates the impact of health-promoting leadership as well as abusive supervision on followers’ social and task resources as antecedents of their health. Moreover, it examines whether the impact of leadership on followers’ health-related resources depends on the followers’ emotional stability and cultural value orientations (i.e. power distance and collectivism). A total of 503 employees from Austria, Germany and Slovenia took part in this online study and provided information on their leaders’ health-promoting behaviour and abusive supervision as well as on their own emotional stability, perceived power distance and collectivism. The results of a hierarchical regression analysis strongly support the importance of simultaneously assessing health-promoting leadership and abusive supervision when predicting task and social resources. Abusive supervision added incremental variance above health-promoting leadership when followers’ task resources were predicted. Moreover, the results suggest that followers benefit from or suffer differently under perceived leadership: high power distance enhances the positive effect of health-promoting leadership on followers’ social resources, while collectivism strengthens the negative impact of abusive supervision on followers’ social resources. Finally, emotionally stable followers who are working with highly abusive leaders experience a stronger threat to their resources compared to emotionally stable followers who are working with less abusive leaders. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of how leaders impact those resources known to influence followers’ health. They further show that follower personality and cultural value orientations determine the impact of leadership behaviour on health-related resources.
追随者的情绪稳定性和文化价值取向如何调节健康促进型领导和滥用型监督对健康相关资源的影响
工作中与健康相关的资源对追随者保持健康和应对工作需求至关重要。本研究探讨了健康促进型领导和虐待型监督对下属社会资源和任务资源的影响。此外,本文还考察了领导对追随者健康相关资源的影响是否取决于追随者的情绪稳定性和文化价值取向(即权力距离和集体主义)。共有来自奥地利、德国和斯洛文尼亚的503名员工参加了这项在线研究,他们提供了有关其领导促进健康的行为和滥用监督的信息,以及他们自己的情绪稳定性、感知的权力距离和集体主义的信息。层次回归分析的结果有力地支持了在预测任务和社会资源时,同时评估促进健康的领导和虐待性监督的重要性。当下属的任务资源被预测时,虐待监督会增加健康促进型领导的增量方差。此外,研究结果还表明,在感知型领导下,下属的受益与损失存在差异:高权力距离增强了健康促进型领导对下属社会资源的积极影响,而集体主义强化了虐待型监督对下属社会资源的消极影响。最后,情绪稳定的下属在与高度辱骂型领导共事时,其资源受到的威胁比情绪稳定的下属在与不那么辱骂型领导共事时受到的威胁更大。这些结果有助于更深入地了解领导者如何影响那些已知会影响下属健康的资源。他们进一步表明,追随者人格和文化价值取向决定了领导行为对健康相关资源的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信