An Empirical Examination of Factors Affecting Behavioral Intention to Use CCIS Using TOE Framework

Hamdi Hidayatullah, A. Hidayanto, F. Azzahro, W. S. Nugroho, Oddi Muhammad Ikbar
{"title":"An Empirical Examination of Factors Affecting Behavioral Intention to Use CCIS Using TOE Framework","authors":"Hamdi Hidayatullah, A. Hidayanto, F. Azzahro, W. S. Nugroho, Oddi Muhammad Ikbar","doi":"10.1109/ICCED.2018.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to achieve public sector reform and more transparent public information disclosure, the Supreme Court of Republic Indonesia developed the Court Case Information System (CCIS). The CCIS are used by the four judicial systems under Supreme Court: General Court, Military Court, State Administration Court, and Religious Court. Although CCIS has developed in 2011, the internal audit conducted in 2015 shows that CCIS only have 40% active users. Moreover, no assessment has been conducted to investigate what factors may play roles in improving users’ intention to use CCIS. This study uses quantitative methods using technology-organizationenvironment (TOE) theory and adds individual contexts to investigate factors affecting individual intentions to use CCIS. There are ten variables tested involving 296 respondents and analyzed by using PLS-SEM approach. The results of this study show that top management support, organization regulation, ease of use, usefulness, self-efficacy and social influence are the factors that may help improving users’ intention to use CCIS.","PeriodicalId":166437,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design (ICCED)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Computing, Engineering, and Design (ICCED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED.2018.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In order to achieve public sector reform and more transparent public information disclosure, the Supreme Court of Republic Indonesia developed the Court Case Information System (CCIS). The CCIS are used by the four judicial systems under Supreme Court: General Court, Military Court, State Administration Court, and Religious Court. Although CCIS has developed in 2011, the internal audit conducted in 2015 shows that CCIS only have 40% active users. Moreover, no assessment has been conducted to investigate what factors may play roles in improving users’ intention to use CCIS. This study uses quantitative methods using technology-organizationenvironment (TOE) theory and adds individual contexts to investigate factors affecting individual intentions to use CCIS. There are ten variables tested involving 296 respondents and analyzed by using PLS-SEM approach. The results of this study show that top management support, organization regulation, ease of use, usefulness, self-efficacy and social influence are the factors that may help improving users’ intention to use CCIS.
基于TOE框架的CCIS行为意向影响因素实证研究
为了实现公共部门改革和更透明的公共信息披露,印度尼西亚共和国最高法院开发了法院案件信息系统(CCIS)。CCIS由最高法院下的四个司法系统使用:普通法院、军事法院、国家行政法院和宗教法院。虽然CCIS在2011年开发,但2015年进行的内部审计显示,CCIS的活跃用户只有40%。此外,没有评估调查哪些因素可能在提高用户使用CCIS的意愿方面发挥作用。本研究运用技术-组织-环境(technology-organization - environment, TOE)理论的定量方法,结合个体情境,探讨影响个体使用CCIS意愿的因素。共测试了10个变量,涉及296名受访者,并采用PLS-SEM方法进行分析。本研究结果显示,高层管理支持、组织监管、易用性、有用性、自我效能感和社会影响力是可能有助于提高用户CCIS使用意愿的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信