Semantic and Symbolic Cueing Effects on the Spatial Attenion Processes

{"title":"Semantic and Symbolic Cueing Effects on the Spatial Attenion Processes","authors":"","doi":"10.7816/nesne-10-25-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a given visual search task, repetition or switch of the target features affect the task performance differently. In the current study, the position of the target is manipulated across trials (trial n  trial n+1) and the target could appear at previous target, distractor or empty /neutral position. Positioning the target at the same position as in the previous trial, compared to neutral position, facilitates the target detection process, known as facilitatory priming effect. Positioning the target at previous distractor location, compared to neutral position, impairs the target detection process, known as inhibitory priming effect. The aim of the present study is to investigate modulations in the facilitatory and inhibitory priming effects,which are related to spatial attention processes, in the presence of different cue types (symbolic, semantic, neutral cues). One of the symbolic, semantic or neutral cues was presented prior to the display onset. The spatial cue could either indicate the location of the target or the distractor item. The cue pointing the target’s location generated the valid cue condition and the cue pointing one of the distractors’ location generated the invalid cue condition. Task performance was assessed by the reaction time dependent variable for the different cue types and cue validty conditions. The results revealed that cue validity and cue type factors affected the facilitatory and inhibitory priming effects differently. As the current study is the first one to investigate these factors, the findings have the potential to deepen the knowledge on spatial attention processes.","PeriodicalId":262181,"journal":{"name":"Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi","volume":"05 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-25-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a given visual search task, repetition or switch of the target features affect the task performance differently. In the current study, the position of the target is manipulated across trials (trial n  trial n+1) and the target could appear at previous target, distractor or empty /neutral position. Positioning the target at the same position as in the previous trial, compared to neutral position, facilitates the target detection process, known as facilitatory priming effect. Positioning the target at previous distractor location, compared to neutral position, impairs the target detection process, known as inhibitory priming effect. The aim of the present study is to investigate modulations in the facilitatory and inhibitory priming effects,which are related to spatial attention processes, in the presence of different cue types (symbolic, semantic, neutral cues). One of the symbolic, semantic or neutral cues was presented prior to the display onset. The spatial cue could either indicate the location of the target or the distractor item. The cue pointing the target’s location generated the valid cue condition and the cue pointing one of the distractors’ location generated the invalid cue condition. Task performance was assessed by the reaction time dependent variable for the different cue types and cue validty conditions. The results revealed that cue validity and cue type factors affected the facilitatory and inhibitory priming effects differently. As the current study is the first one to investigate these factors, the findings have the potential to deepen the knowledge on spatial attention processes.
语义和符号提示对空间注意过程的影响
在给定的视觉搜索任务中,目标特征的重复或切换对任务性能的影响是不同的。在本研究中,目标的位置在不同的试验中被操纵(试验n /试验n+1),目标可以出现在先前的目标位置、分心位置或空/中立位置。将目标放置在与前一次试验相同的位置,与中立位置相比,促进了目标的发现过程,称为促进启动效应。将目标放置在先前的干扰物位置,与中立位置相比,会损害目标检测过程,称为抑制启动效应。本研究旨在探讨不同提示类型(符号提示、语义提示、中性提示)对空间注意过程的促进启动效应和抑制启动效应的调节。在展示开始前,先呈现一个符号、语义或中性线索。空间线索既可以指示目标的位置,也可以指示干扰项的位置。指向目标位置的线索产生有效线索条件,指向干扰者位置的线索产生无效线索条件。在不同提示类型和提示效度条件下,以反应时间因变量评价任务绩效。结果表明,提示效度和提示类型因素对促进启动效应和抑制启动效应的影响不同。由于本研究是第一次对这些因素进行调查,研究结果有可能加深对空间注意过程的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信