Dr. Emad Sabri Najm, Dr. Anwar Ahmed Fadhil, Dr. Raghad Mohamed Shibli Younis
{"title":"The Effect of Fluid Preloading on the Incidence of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia","authors":"Dr. Emad Sabri Najm, Dr. Anwar Ahmed Fadhil, Dr. Raghad Mohamed Shibli Younis","doi":"10.55529/jpdmhd.34.26.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Small doses of local anaesthetic are injected into the CSF fluid in the subarachnoid region to produce spinal anaesthesia (SA). \nAim: This paper was contributed to study the effect of fluid preloading on the incidence of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia. \nPatients and methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 45 patients in different hospitals in Iraq for a study that ranged from the 15th of June in the year 2021 to the 24th of August in the year 2022. This paper dealt with the study of the effect of fluid preload on the incidence of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia, as it included in the clinical characteristics’ tests related to mothers or women who underwent caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. This study divided the collected data into two groups, one of which was the patient group, which included patients who underwent spinal anaesthesia, which this group is considered as the co-loading group, which included 23 patients out of the total number of patients' data collected, while it was represented by the preload group, which included women who underwent spinal anaesthesia, which included 22 patients out of the total number of patients. This paper was conducting and analysing the collected data by SPSS. \nDiscussion: The difference was that when their systolic blood pressure fell to 90 mm Hg, they began using a vasopressor heavily. The current finding found the Apgar score of the co-load who patients group (8.91) was found higher that preload who control group (8.95%) within 5 min in compare 1 min. In the present analysis, there was also a statistically significant variation between the co-load (81.4%) and pre-load (45.3%) groups in terms of the incidence of hypotension. The incidence of hypotension was statistically significantly different between the preload (80%) as well as co-load (51%) groups, according to research through (Oh AY et al., 2014). Both trials revealed that the co-load group's blood pressure dramatically decreased. \nConclusion: This study found that (45.3%) were within the preload group as a control group and (81.4%) in the co-load group as patients group had hypotension. Preloading was, therefore, more effective than co-loading in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension of cesarean section moms. It may not be essential to postpone surgery to provide a preload of liquids.","PeriodicalId":156613,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Human Diseases","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Human Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55529/jpdmhd.34.26.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Small doses of local anaesthetic are injected into the CSF fluid in the subarachnoid region to produce spinal anaesthesia (SA).
Aim: This paper was contributed to study the effect of fluid preloading on the incidence of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia.
Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 45 patients in different hospitals in Iraq for a study that ranged from the 15th of June in the year 2021 to the 24th of August in the year 2022. This paper dealt with the study of the effect of fluid preload on the incidence of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia, as it included in the clinical characteristics’ tests related to mothers or women who underwent caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. This study divided the collected data into two groups, one of which was the patient group, which included patients who underwent spinal anaesthesia, which this group is considered as the co-loading group, which included 23 patients out of the total number of patients' data collected, while it was represented by the preload group, which included women who underwent spinal anaesthesia, which included 22 patients out of the total number of patients. This paper was conducting and analysing the collected data by SPSS.
Discussion: The difference was that when their systolic blood pressure fell to 90 mm Hg, they began using a vasopressor heavily. The current finding found the Apgar score of the co-load who patients group (8.91) was found higher that preload who control group (8.95%) within 5 min in compare 1 min. In the present analysis, there was also a statistically significant variation between the co-load (81.4%) and pre-load (45.3%) groups in terms of the incidence of hypotension. The incidence of hypotension was statistically significantly different between the preload (80%) as well as co-load (51%) groups, according to research through (Oh AY et al., 2014). Both trials revealed that the co-load group's blood pressure dramatically decreased.
Conclusion: This study found that (45.3%) were within the preload group as a control group and (81.4%) in the co-load group as patients group had hypotension. Preloading was, therefore, more effective than co-loading in preventing spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension of cesarean section moms. It may not be essential to postpone surgery to provide a preload of liquids.
背景:将小剂量局部麻醉剂注射到蛛网膜下腔的脑脊液中以产生脊髓麻醉(SA)。目的:研究脊髓麻醉中液体预负荷对低血压发生率的影响。患者和方法:本横断面研究从2021年6月15日至2022年8月24日在伊拉克不同医院招募了45名患者。本文研究了脊髓麻醉期间液体预负荷对低血压发生率的影响,因为它包括在与脊髓麻醉下剖腹产的母亲或妇女相关的临床特征测试中。本研究将收集到的数据分为两组,其中一组为患者组,包括接受脊髓麻醉的患者,该组被认为是共加载组,包括收集的患者数据总数中的23例患者,而以预加载组为代表,包括接受脊髓麻醉的女性,包括22例患者。本文采用SPSS软件对收集到的数据进行分析。讨论:不同之处在于,当他们的收缩压降至90毫米汞柱时,他们开始大量使用血管加压剂。目前的研究发现,在5分钟内,与1分钟相比,联合负荷组的Apgar评分(8.91)高于预负荷组(8.95%)。在本分析中,就低血压的发生率而言,联合负荷组(81.4%)和预负荷组(45.3%)之间也存在统计学差异。根据(Oh AY et al., 2014)的研究,预负荷组(80%)和共负荷组(51%)的低血压发生率在统计学上有显著差异。两项试验都显示,共同负荷组的血压显著下降。结论:本研究发现,作为对照组的预负荷组(45.3%)和作为患者组的共负荷组(81.4%)存在低血压。因此,在预防剖宫产产妇脊柱麻醉引起的低血压方面,预负荷比共负荷更有效。可能没有必要推迟手术以提供预负荷的液体。