Does Practice Always Make Perfect? A Study of Whether Psychotherapists Treating Older Adults Become More Efficient as They Gain More Experience

L. Larsen, M. Christoffersen, Anna Pacak-Vedel
{"title":"Does Practice Always Make Perfect? A Study of Whether Psychotherapists Treating Older Adults Become More Efficient as They Gain More Experience","authors":"L. Larsen, M. Christoffersen, Anna Pacak-Vedel","doi":"10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2022.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current longitudinal study investigates the effects of practice on the outcome of psychotherapy for elderly persons. It follows 4 psychologists for the first 143 clients of their professional lives to explore whether increased practice leads to better outcomes for their clients. The participating psychologists routinely monitor the effect of their work with different psychometric outcome measures and receive weekly supervision. The clients consist of 267 primarily elderly persons above the age of 65, who receive psychotherapy to improve their overall well-being. Well-being is measured with the WHO-5 Well-being Index. Regression analyses, with outcome improvement functioning as the dependent variable, were calculated as pre-treatment scores subtracted from post-treatment scores. There was no significant effect of the chronological rank of clients on the overall effect of treatment. Hence, no practice effects were found in terms of increased well-being. Variations in effect did not change either. However, the psychologists used significantly fewer sessions to achieve the same effect as time went on, as there was a significant effect of the chronological rank of clients on the number of sessions. Though significant, the size of this effect was small. Results are discussed in the light of the literature on expertise and expert performance, and possible ways to increase the effect in psychotherapy with elderly persons are suggested.","PeriodicalId":297862,"journal":{"name":"IICE Official Conference Proceedings","volume":"2005 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IICE Official Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2022.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current longitudinal study investigates the effects of practice on the outcome of psychotherapy for elderly persons. It follows 4 psychologists for the first 143 clients of their professional lives to explore whether increased practice leads to better outcomes for their clients. The participating psychologists routinely monitor the effect of their work with different psychometric outcome measures and receive weekly supervision. The clients consist of 267 primarily elderly persons above the age of 65, who receive psychotherapy to improve their overall well-being. Well-being is measured with the WHO-5 Well-being Index. Regression analyses, with outcome improvement functioning as the dependent variable, were calculated as pre-treatment scores subtracted from post-treatment scores. There was no significant effect of the chronological rank of clients on the overall effect of treatment. Hence, no practice effects were found in terms of increased well-being. Variations in effect did not change either. However, the psychologists used significantly fewer sessions to achieve the same effect as time went on, as there was a significant effect of the chronological rank of clients on the number of sessions. Though significant, the size of this effect was small. Results are discussed in the light of the literature on expertise and expert performance, and possible ways to increase the effect in psychotherapy with elderly persons are suggested.
熟能生巧吗?一项研究是否心理治疗师治疗老年人变得更有效,因为他们获得更多的经验
目前的纵向研究调查了实践对老年人心理治疗结果的影响。它追踪了4位心理学家对其职业生涯的前143位客户的调查,以探索增加练习是否会给他们的客户带来更好的结果。参与研究的心理学家通常会用不同的心理测量结果来监测他们的工作效果,并接受每周的监督。客户包括267名主要是65岁以上的老年人,他们接受心理治疗,以改善他们的整体健康状况。福祉是用世卫组织5幸福指数衡量的。回归分析以结果改善作为因变量,计算为治疗前得分减去治疗后得分。来访者的时间顺序对治疗的总体效果没有显著影响。因此,就幸福感增加而言,没有发现练习的影响。效果的变化也没有改变。然而,随着时间的推移,心理学家使用的疗程明显减少,达到了同样的效果,因为客户的时间顺序对疗程数量有显著影响。这种影响虽然显著,但规模很小。结合专业知识和专家表现方面的文献对结果进行了讨论,并提出了提高老年人心理治疗效果的可能途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信