Smaller is Better? Maximization of Good Chips per Wafer by Co-Optimization of Yield and Chip Area

H. Melzner
{"title":"Smaller is Better? Maximization of Good Chips per Wafer by Co-Optimization of Yield and Chip Area","authors":"H. Melzner","doi":"10.1109/ASMC.2006.1638786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two factors defining number of good chips that can be picked from a wafer are yield and number of chips per wafer. Number of chips is primarily defined by chip area -together with details such as die aspect ratio, kerf width, edge exclusion, and die placement. While yields play the major role once a chip design is finished, in the design phase chip area can still be influenced. It is frequently thought that \"smaller is better\", i.e. a given functionality should be realized on a minimum silicon area. This is certainly true if there are no strong relationships between area and yield. In some cases, however, there are such strong relationships - a good example is redundancy configuration for memory chips or embedded memories. Powerful redundancy typically requires more area, but can boost yield on the other hand. Analog circuits may be more robust and have higher yield if devices are designed larger. Even in logic chips, DfM measures such as via duplication may sometimes increase chip area. In all these cases, an optimum of yield gain versus area growth has to be found. In this paper, we review and discuss some relationships between yield and area and present methods for optimization of good chips per wafer","PeriodicalId":407645,"journal":{"name":"The 17th Annual SEMI/IEEE ASMC 2006 Conference","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 17th Annual SEMI/IEEE ASMC 2006 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASMC.2006.1638786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The two factors defining number of good chips that can be picked from a wafer are yield and number of chips per wafer. Number of chips is primarily defined by chip area -together with details such as die aspect ratio, kerf width, edge exclusion, and die placement. While yields play the major role once a chip design is finished, in the design phase chip area can still be influenced. It is frequently thought that "smaller is better", i.e. a given functionality should be realized on a minimum silicon area. This is certainly true if there are no strong relationships between area and yield. In some cases, however, there are such strong relationships - a good example is redundancy configuration for memory chips or embedded memories. Powerful redundancy typically requires more area, but can boost yield on the other hand. Analog circuits may be more robust and have higher yield if devices are designed larger. Even in logic chips, DfM measures such as via duplication may sometimes increase chip area. In all these cases, an optimum of yield gain versus area growth has to be found. In this paper, we review and discuss some relationships between yield and area and present methods for optimization of good chips per wafer
越小越好?通过共同优化良率和芯片面积来最大化每片晶圆的优质芯片
决定晶圆片上优质芯片数量的两个因素是产量和每片晶圆片上的芯片数量。芯片的数量主要由芯片面积来定义,以及诸如模具长宽比、切口宽度、边缘排除和模具放置等细节。当晶片设计完成后,晶片面积仍会受到影响。通常认为“越小越好”,即给定的功能应该在最小的硅面积上实现。如果面积和产量之间没有很强的关系,这当然是正确的。然而,在某些情况下,存在如此强的关系—一个很好的例子是存储芯片或嵌入式存储器的冗余配置。强大的冗余通常需要更多的面积,但另一方面可以提高产量。如果器件设计得更大,模拟电路可能更健壮,产量也更高。即使在逻辑芯片中,DfM措施(如通过复制)有时也会增加芯片面积。在所有这些情况下,必须找到产量增益与面积增长的最佳关系。在本文中,我们回顾并讨论了良率与面积之间的一些关系,并提出了优化每片晶片优质芯片的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信