Power Resilience Assessment from Physical and Socio-Demographic Perspectives

M. B. Ulak, Anil Yazici, E. Ozguven, O. A. Vanli, R. Arghandeh
{"title":"Power Resilience Assessment from Physical and Socio-Demographic Perspectives","authors":"M. B. Ulak, Anil Yazici, E. Ozguven, O. A. Vanli, R. Arghandeh","doi":"10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban resilience is a multifaceted concept including the recovery of the physical infrastructure and various urban activities that depend on that physical infrastructure. It is relatively straightforward to quantify infrastructure resilience by tracking the recovered facilities in time and marking the time that the infrastructure is fully functioning again. However, the physical infrastructure recovery does not necessarily indicate that the urban activities bounce back to the predisaster conditions. The restoration of urban activities depends on the areas that a particular infrastructure serves (e.g., residential, commercial) and the connections with other critical facilities (e.g., health, education). It is important to investigate the infrastructure recovery and “resilience divide” with respect to the enabled services and affected populations in order to achieve all-inclusive resilience. For this purpose, we examined the resilience of different physical elements such as power feeders (i.e., underground or overhead lines), critical facilities (e.g., fire and rescue services, hospitals) and different socio-demographic segments of the population (i.e., different age groups, ethnicities, and income levels) which constitute an urban environment. The analyses were conducted using the power outages experienced after Hurricane Hermine in Tallahassee, as a case study. The findings show that overall resilience performance can be distinct and/or not homogeneous for the resilience of different physical elements, urban services, and population groups.","PeriodicalId":430931,"journal":{"name":"2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS)","volume":"9 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 4th International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSRS48664.2019.8987673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Urban resilience is a multifaceted concept including the recovery of the physical infrastructure and various urban activities that depend on that physical infrastructure. It is relatively straightforward to quantify infrastructure resilience by tracking the recovered facilities in time and marking the time that the infrastructure is fully functioning again. However, the physical infrastructure recovery does not necessarily indicate that the urban activities bounce back to the predisaster conditions. The restoration of urban activities depends on the areas that a particular infrastructure serves (e.g., residential, commercial) and the connections with other critical facilities (e.g., health, education). It is important to investigate the infrastructure recovery and “resilience divide” with respect to the enabled services and affected populations in order to achieve all-inclusive resilience. For this purpose, we examined the resilience of different physical elements such as power feeders (i.e., underground or overhead lines), critical facilities (e.g., fire and rescue services, hospitals) and different socio-demographic segments of the population (i.e., different age groups, ethnicities, and income levels) which constitute an urban environment. The analyses were conducted using the power outages experienced after Hurricane Hermine in Tallahassee, as a case study. The findings show that overall resilience performance can be distinct and/or not homogeneous for the resilience of different physical elements, urban services, and population groups.
从物理和社会人口统计学角度评估电力恢复力
城市韧性是一个多方面的概念,包括物质基础设施的恢复以及依赖于这些物质基础设施的各种城市活动。通过及时跟踪恢复的设施并标记基础设施再次完全运行的时间,可以相对直接地量化基础设施的恢复能力。然而,物质基础设施的恢复并不一定表明城市活动恢复到灾前的状况。城市活动的恢复取决于特定基础设施服务的地区(如住宅、商业)以及与其他关键设施(如保健、教育)的联系。重要的是调查基础设施恢复和受影响服务和人口方面的“复原力鸿沟”,以实现全面的复原力。为此,我们研究了构成城市环境的不同物理要素的复原力,如电源馈线(即地下或架空线路)、关键设施(如消防和救援服务、医院)和不同社会人口组成部分(即不同年龄组、种族和收入水平)。该分析以飓风Hermine在塔拉哈西(Tallahassee)造成的停电为例进行。研究结果表明,对于不同的物理要素、城市服务和人口群体,整体弹性表现可能是不同的和/或不均匀的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信