Conversion of radius of curvature to power (and vice versa)

S. Wickenhagen, K. Endo, U. Fuchs, R. Youngworth, S. Kiontke
{"title":"Conversion of radius of curvature to power (and vice versa)","authors":"S. Wickenhagen, K. Endo, U. Fuchs, R. Youngworth, S. Kiontke","doi":"10.1117/12.2191400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Manufacturing optical components relies on good measurements and specifications. One of the most precise measurements routinely required is the form accuracy. In practice, form deviation from the ideal surface is effectively low frequency errors, where the form error most often accounts for no more than a few undulations across a surface. These types of errors are measured in a variety of ways including interferometry and tactile methods like profilometry, with the latter often being employed for aspheres and general surface shapes such as freeforms. This paper provides a basis for a correct description of power and radius of curvature tolerances, including best practices and calculating the power value with respect to the radius deviation (and vice versa) of the surface form. A consistent definition of the sagitta is presented, along with different cases in manufacturing that are of interest to fabricators and designers. The results make clear how the definitions and results should be documented, for all measurement setups. Relationships between power and radius of curvature are shown that allow specifying the preferred metric based on final accuracy and measurement method. Results shown include all necessary equations for conversion to give optical designers and manufacturers a consistent and robust basis for decision-making. The paper also gives guidance on preferred methods for different scenarios for surface types, accuracy required, and metrology methods employed.","PeriodicalId":212434,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Optical Systems Design","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Optical Systems Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2191400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Manufacturing optical components relies on good measurements and specifications. One of the most precise measurements routinely required is the form accuracy. In practice, form deviation from the ideal surface is effectively low frequency errors, where the form error most often accounts for no more than a few undulations across a surface. These types of errors are measured in a variety of ways including interferometry and tactile methods like profilometry, with the latter often being employed for aspheres and general surface shapes such as freeforms. This paper provides a basis for a correct description of power and radius of curvature tolerances, including best practices and calculating the power value with respect to the radius deviation (and vice versa) of the surface form. A consistent definition of the sagitta is presented, along with different cases in manufacturing that are of interest to fabricators and designers. The results make clear how the definitions and results should be documented, for all measurement setups. Relationships between power and radius of curvature are shown that allow specifying the preferred metric based on final accuracy and measurement method. Results shown include all necessary equations for conversion to give optical designers and manufacturers a consistent and robust basis for decision-making. The paper also gives guidance on preferred methods for different scenarios for surface types, accuracy required, and metrology methods employed.
曲率半径到功率的转换(反之亦然)
制造光学元件依赖于良好的测量和规格。通常要求的最精确的测量之一是形状精度。在实践中,与理想表面的形状偏差实际上是低频误差,其中形状误差通常不超过表面上的几个波动。这些类型的误差可以通过多种方式测量,包括干涉测量法和像轮廓测量法这样的触觉方法,后者通常用于球面和一般表面形状(如自由曲面)。本文为正确描述曲率公差的功率和半径提供了基础,包括最佳实践和计算相对于曲面形状的半径偏差的功率值(反之亦然)。提出了一个一致的矢形定义,以及制造商和设计师感兴趣的制造中的不同案例。结果明确定义和结果应如何记录,为所有的测量设置。显示了功率与曲率半径之间的关系,允许根据最终精度和测量方法指定首选度量。所显示的结果包括所有必要的转换方程,为光学设计人员和制造商提供一致和可靠的决策基础。本文还给出了对不同场景的表面类型,精度要求和计量方法的优选方法的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信