Anticipating Ethics

Brian M. O'Connell
{"title":"Anticipating Ethics","authors":"Brian M. O'Connell","doi":"10.1109/isee.2006.1650031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal and ethical decisions regarding developing technologies are frequently based upon understandings derived from explanations provided by \"experts\" within developing fields as well as upon tacit public perceptions. This paper focuses upon the emerging fields of robotics and neuroethics to examine the reliability of these primary sources. Included in this assessment is a consideration of internal, disciplinary narratives, the place of metaphor within expert discourse, the role of public expectations in new technologies with current factual possibilities and the state of coordination among technical and policy-oriented disciplines in establishing useful and robust public accounts and ethical-legal standards for new technologies","PeriodicalId":141255,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/isee.2006.1650031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Legal and ethical decisions regarding developing technologies are frequently based upon understandings derived from explanations provided by "experts" within developing fields as well as upon tacit public perceptions. This paper focuses upon the emerging fields of robotics and neuroethics to examine the reliability of these primary sources. Included in this assessment is a consideration of internal, disciplinary narratives, the place of metaphor within expert discourse, the role of public expectations in new technologies with current factual possibilities and the state of coordination among technical and policy-oriented disciplines in establishing useful and robust public accounts and ethical-legal standards for new technologies
预测道德
关于开发技术的法律和伦理决定往往基于发展领域内“专家”提供的解释以及默认的公众看法的理解。本文主要关注机器人和神经伦理学的新兴领域,以检查这些主要来源的可靠性。这项评估包括对内部学科叙述的考虑,隐喻在专家话语中的地位,公众对具有当前事实可能性的新技术的期望的作用,以及在为新技术建立有用和有力的公共帐户和道德-法律标准方面,技术和政策导向学科之间的协调状况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信