S39 Is the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection amongst recent migrants safe and effective in primary care?

M. Burman, D. Zenner, A. Copas, L. Goscé, H. Haghparast-Bidgoli, P. White, V. Hickson, O. Greyson, D. Trathen, R. Ashcroft, A. Martineau, I. Abubakar, C. Griffiths, H. Kunst
{"title":"S39 Is the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection amongst recent migrants safe and effective in primary care?","authors":"M. Burman, D. Zenner, A. Copas, L. Goscé, H. Haghparast-Bidgoli, P. White, V. Hickson, O. Greyson, D. Trathen, R. Ashcroft, A. Martineau, I. Abubakar, C. Griffiths, H. Kunst","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TNF-a, IL2 and CCL7 had very low raw biomarker concentrations. In Phase II, based on above results, we analysed IFN-g, CXCL10 and CCL2 in a further 60 patients (table 1). CXCL10 achieved the highest increase in TP results for ATB diagnosis, with 43 TP compared with 26 TP results for QFTGIT. MSD-measured IFN-g detected 41 TP results, while CCL2 only detected 26 TP. All three biomarkers demonstrated >35% loss of specificity compared to QFT-GIT. The QFTGIT sensitivity and specificity values in our study population were 45.6% and 80% respectively. A ‘triple-test’ combining IFN-g, CXCL10 and CCL2 results achieved sensitivity 83.3% and specificity 12.1%. Conclusion Our study provides a unique and novel gating method for efficiently assessing the diagnostic performance of candidate biomarkers for ATB diagnosis. Our study population was purposely engineered to compare candidate biomarkers to QFT-GIT in a clinically-relevant manner and we hope our study design will aid future, targeted efforts for high-quality biomarker follow-up studies.","PeriodicalId":286308,"journal":{"name":"Beyond acid-fast: diagnosis and treatment of TB in the 21st Century","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond acid-fast: diagnosis and treatment of TB in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TNF-a, IL2 and CCL7 had very low raw biomarker concentrations. In Phase II, based on above results, we analysed IFN-g, CXCL10 and CCL2 in a further 60 patients (table 1). CXCL10 achieved the highest increase in TP results for ATB diagnosis, with 43 TP compared with 26 TP results for QFTGIT. MSD-measured IFN-g detected 41 TP results, while CCL2 only detected 26 TP. All three biomarkers demonstrated >35% loss of specificity compared to QFT-GIT. The QFTGIT sensitivity and specificity values in our study population were 45.6% and 80% respectively. A ‘triple-test’ combining IFN-g, CXCL10 and CCL2 results achieved sensitivity 83.3% and specificity 12.1%. Conclusion Our study provides a unique and novel gating method for efficiently assessing the diagnostic performance of candidate biomarkers for ATB diagnosis. Our study population was purposely engineered to compare candidate biomarkers to QFT-GIT in a clinically-relevant manner and we hope our study design will aid future, targeted efforts for high-quality biomarker follow-up studies.
S39在初级保健中对新近移徙者潜伏性结核感染的治疗安全有效吗?
TNF-a、il - 2和CCL7的原始生物标志物浓度非常低。在II期,基于上述结果,我们分析了另外60例患者的IFN-g、CXCL10和CCL2(表1)。CXCL10在ATB诊断中的TP结果增加最多,为43个TP,而QFTGIT的TP结果为26个TP。msd检测的IFN-g检测到41个TP,而CCL2仅检测到26个TP。与QFT-GIT相比,这三种生物标志物的特异性均下降了>35%。QFTGIT在我们的研究人群中的敏感性和特异性分别为45.6%和80%。IFN-g、CXCL10和CCL2的“三重测试”结果的灵敏度为83.3%,特异性为12.1%。结论本研究为有效评估ATB候选生物标志物的诊断性能提供了一种独特而新颖的门控方法。我们的研究人群经过精心设计,以临床相关的方式将候选生物标志物与QFT-GIT进行比较,我们希望我们的研究设计将有助于未来有针对性的高质量生物标志物随访研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信